Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Controlled Clinical Trial
. 2010 Mar-Apr;17(2):212-6.
doi: 10.1136/jamia.2009.002436.

Population informatics-based system to improve osteoporosis screening in women in a primary care practice

Rebecca L Kesman  1 , Ahmed S Rahman, Eleanor Y Lin, Eric A Barnitt, Rajeev Chaudhry
Affiliations
Controlled Clinical Trial

Population informatics-based system to improve osteoporosis screening in women in a primary care practice

Rebecca L Kesman et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To study the effects of using a population-based informatics system for osteoporosis screening and treatment in women aged 65 years or older.

Design: A population-based informatics system (PRECARES: PREventive CAre REminder System) was implemented to meet the needs of the workflow of a primary care practice. Patients treated in either of two sections of a primary care internal medicine department were selected for the intervention, and patients of a comparable third section served as the control group. PRECARES identified women in the intervention group who were due for osteoporosis screening on the basis of age and who had no record of previous screening in our clinical system. If these eligible patients did not have an upcoming outpatient appointment, appointment secretaries sent a letter requesting that they call to make an appointment for a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan.

Measurements: At baseline and 3 months after the letters were sent, a database was used to determine the rate of osteoporosis screening in the intervention and control groups.

Results: A total of 689 patients in the intervention group were sent the letter. Three months after the letters were sent, the rate of osteoporosis screening was 76.4% (2409/3152) in the intervention group vs 69% (928/1344) in the control group (p<0.001). In the intervention group, 25% of the 689 patients responded to the letter and completed osteoporosis screening. Patients who had osteoporosis screening received appropriate treatment.

Conclusion: A population-based informatics system for primary care practice significantly improved the rate of osteoporosis screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of patients in the intervention group identified by PRECARES as due for osteoporosis screening. DEXA, dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General, 2004
    1. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, et al. Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 2007;223:465–75 - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for osteoporosis: topic page [Internet]. Rockville, MD: U.S. preventive services task force, agency for healthcare research and quality, 2002. [cited 2008 Jun 30]: http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/uspstf/uspsoste.htm
    1. National Osteoporosis Foundation Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Washington, DC: National Osteoporosis Foundation, 2008
    1. Gallagher TC, Geling O, Comite F. Missed opportunities for prevention of osteoporotic fracture. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:450–6 - PubMed

Publication types