Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 16;107(11):5118-23.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0915146107. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

From combinatorial peptide selection to drug prototype (II): targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway

Affiliations

From combinatorial peptide selection to drug prototype (II): targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway

Marina Cardó-Vila et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a tyrosine kinase, is central to human tumorigenesis. Typically, three classes of drugs inhibit tyrosine kinase pathways: blocking antibodies, small kinase inhibitors, and soluble ligand receptor traps/decoys. Only the first two types of EGFR-binding inhibitory drugs are clinically available; notably, no EGFR decoy has yet been developed. Here we identify small molecules mimicking EGFR and that functionally behave as soluble decoys for EGF and TGFalpha, ligands that would otherwise activate downstream signaling. After combinatorial library selection on EGFR ligands, a panel of binding peptides was narrowed by structure-function analysis. The most active motif was CVRAC (EGFR 283-287), which is necessary and sufficient for specific EGFR ligand binding. Finally, a synthetic retro-inverted derivative, (D)(CARVC), became our preclinical prototype of choice. This study reveals an EGFR-decoy drug candidate with translational potential.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Screening of a combinatorial random peptide library on EGFR ligands EGF, TGFα, and cetuximab. (A) EGF panning. VEGF and BSA were used as negative control proteins in A and B. (B) TGFα panning. (C) M225 monoclonal antibody (the original murine version of cetuximab) was immobilized onto microtiter wells at a concentration of 2 μg. The CX7C phage library was incubated with each of the target proteins. Shown are the relative transducing units (TU) obtained from each well coated with M225, mIgG, or BSA after three rounds of selection (RI–RIII). (D) Specificity of the peptides recovered from RIII targeting. M225 was recapitulated upon binding to cetuximab on a fourth round of selection (RIV). Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate wells.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Mapping candidate epitopes within the EGFR. (A) Amino acid sequence corresponding to the extracellular domain of the EGFR (accession no. NP_005219). Leu1 is the first residue after the signal peptide. The arrow designates the signal peptide cleavage site. Yellow highlights indicate five consensus regions to which peptides derived from library screenings (on the ligands EGF, TGFα, and cetuximab) were clustered. Green and red boxes pinpoint the reciprocal residues in the two EGFR molecules involved in dimerization. (B) Location of a cetuximab-binding region within the EGFR structure. Light green and light red ribbons indicate the backbone of each EGFR homodimer. Purple designates the TGFα ligand bound to the EGFR. (Inset) Red and green indicate residues involved in EGFR dimerization (see A). Yellow ribbon shows the location of CVRAC within the EGFR homodimer (residues 283–287). (C) CVRAC-displaying phage binds specifically to cetuximab, EGF, and TGF-α. VEGF and BSA served as negative controls for binding. Recombinant proteins were coated onto microtiter wells at 10 μg/mL, and wells were incubated with either CVRAC-phage or CVAAC-phage (alanine scanning control). An insertless phage was an additional negative control. Phage input was 109 TU per well. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM of triplicate wells.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Molecular interaction of CVRAC, cetuximab, and EGFR. (A) Synthetic peptides (CVRACGAD or CVRAC), compared to an unrelated control peptide (SDNRYIGSW), specifically bind to cetuximab. BSA served as an additional negative control, and the EGFR as a positive control. (B) Concentration-dependent inhibition of binding of cetuximab to the EGFR by the synthetic peptides CVRACGAD and CVRAC, in comparison with negative controls: an EGFR sequence-derived peptide (CQKCDPSC) and an unrelated negative control peptide. (C) Phage displaying alanine scanning versions of the CVRAC peptide (CARAC and CVAAC) were used to identify critical residues on the basis of their capacity to bind to cetuximab. Insertless phage served as a negative control. (D) Polyclonal antibody against CVRAC recognized the EGFR. Bars represent mean ± SEM.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The retro-inverso peptidomimetic of the CVRAC motif is recognized by cetuximab and inhibits binding of cetuximab to the EGFR. (A) Human HN5 tumor cells were treated with increasing concentrations of cetuximab (black line). Cells were also exposed to either 60 μM (red line) or 180 μM (blue line) CVRAC. Unrelated control peptide (purple line) or EGFR-related control peptide (green line) had no effect on cetuximab activity. A representative experiment is depicted. Experiments were repeated four times with similar results. Bars represent mean ± SEM. (B) Binding of retro-inverso D-form peptides (plated at 10 μg/mL) to cetuximab in an ELISA-based assay. Equivalent amounts of IgGs (cetuximab, anti-CVRAC, or h-IgG) were analyzed for binding to CVRAC or to its retro-inverso peptidomimetic D(CARVC). (C) Effect of the synthetic peptides on HN5 tumor cells. Cells were incubated with increasing concentrations (up to 250 mM) of the peptide CVRAC, the retro-inverso peptidomimetic D(CARVC), or a negative control peptide. Viability in the absence of peptide was set to 100%. (D) Inhibition of EGFR:cetuximab association, monitored by SPR in the presence of synthetic peptides or peptidomimetic D(CARVC). Bars represent mean ± SEM. (E) Analysis of receptor autophosphorylation in cells stimulated with EGF or control media for 15 min, after which cetuximab or synthetic peptides were added with the growth factor to evaluate inhibition. Receptors were immunoprecipitated with antibodies against phosphorylated (p)EGFR and were immunoblotted with anti-phosphotyrosine IgG. This representative experiment shows that D(CARVC) specifically inhibits the phosphorylation of the EGFR in human HN5 tumor cells.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
CVRAC-targeted phage homes to tumors. (A) Phage displaying the peptide CVRAC or CVAAC, or insertless negative control phage, were administered i.v. into mice bearing EF43.fgf-4-derived tumors. An anti-phage antibody was used for staining. H&E staining, with the corresponding fluorescence-based immunostaining, is shown in tumors. Tumor-bearing mice received CVRAC phage, CVAAC phage, or insertless control phage as indicated. Cohorts of tumor-bearing mice (n = 5 mice/group) were used. A representative experiment is shown. (Scale bar, 100 μm.) (B) Treatment of tumor-bearing mice with peptides and peptidomimetics. BALB/c mice bearing EF43.fgf-4-derived tumors were divided into size-matched cohorts (n = 7 mice/group); individual tumor volumes are represented before (black circles) and after (white circles) treatment. Peptides and peptidomimetics were administered at 750 μg/mouse/dose for 5 days. Shown are mean tumor volumes ± SEM.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
The prototype peptidomimetic drug D(CARVC) functions through an EGFR-decoy mechanism. (A) D(CARVC) displaces EGF from the EGFR. The EGFR was coated onto 96-well plates at decreasing concentrations. Increasing molar concentrations of the synthetic peptidomimetic D(CARVC) were used to evaluate competitive inhibition of EGF binding (squares). D(CAAVC) was used as a negative peptidomimetic control at the same concentrations (circles). Cetuximab (12 nM) served as a positive control for the displacement of EGF from the EGFR. (B) D(CARVC) displaces the binding of TGFα from the EGFR. Evaluation is shown of the competitive inhibition of the binding of TGFα to the EGFR by increasing molar concentrations (as indicated) of the synthetic peptidomimetic D(CARVC). Bars represent mean ± SEM.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gusterson BA, Hunter KD. Should we be surprised at the paucity of response to EGFR inhibitors? Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:522–527. - PubMed
    1. Baselga J. Targeting tyrosine kinases in cancer: The second wave. Science. 2006;312:1175–1178. - PubMed
    1. Kawamoto T, et al. Growth stimulation of A431 cells by epidermal growth factor: Identification of high-affinity receptors for epidermal growth factor by an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80:1337–1341. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lynch TJ, et al. Activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor underlying responsiveness of non-small-cell lung cancer to gefitinib. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:2129–2139. - PubMed
    1. Mellinghoff IK, et al. Molecular determinants of the response of glioblastomas to EGFR kinase inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2012–2024. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms