Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Fall;42(3):711-6.
doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-711.

A further analysis of the value of choice: controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items

Anna C Schmidt  1 , Gregory P Hanley, Stacy A Layer
Affiliations

A further analysis of the value of choice: controlling for illusory discriminative stimuli and evaluating the effects of less preferred items

Anna C Schmidt et al. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall.

Abstract

We sought to address limitations of prior research that has isolated choice as an independent variable. Children's preferences for the opportunity to choose were evaluated in a concurrent-chains arrangement in which identical consequences were available in choice and no-choice conditions. Results demonstrated that preference for choice, in and of itself, was (a) evident in children, (b) not controlled by illusory discriminative stimuli such as the amount from which to choose, and (c) generally unaffected by less preferred and potentially unimportant consequences.

Keywords: choice; concurrent-chains arrangement; preference assessment; preschool children.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of initial-link selections of choice, no-choice, and control conditions for all children. Asterisks indicate the cessation of praise for accurate responses in terminal links (Lena and Alton).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brigham T.A, Sherman J.A. Effects of choice and immediacy of reinforcement on single response and switching behavior of children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1973;19:425–435. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunlap G, dePerczel M, Clarke S, Wilson D, Wright S, White R, et al. Choice making to promote adaptive behaviors for students with emotional and behavioral challenges. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1994;27:505–518. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dyer K, Dunlap G, Winterling V. Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1990;23:515–524. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher W, Piazza C.C, Bowman L.G, Hagopian L.P, Owens J.C, Slevin I. A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1992;25:491–498. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fisher W.W, Thompson R.H, Piazza C.C, Crosland K, Gotjen D. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1997;30:423–438. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources