[What's new in the diagnosis and management of urinary lithiasis?]
- PMID: 20191228
- DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302009000600018
[What's new in the diagnosis and management of urinary lithiasis?]
Abstract
Objective: To update some aspects of the diagnosis and management of urinary lithiasis.
Methods: A review of the main articles published in PubMed indexed journals was performed.
Results: The occurrence of urinary stones is higher among patients with body mass index above 30. Urinary stones are correctly diagnosed by non-contrast CT in 98% of the cases. SWL is the best method for treatment of renal stones smaller than 2 cm with tomographic density under 1000 HU except for stones located at the lower renal pole where the limit is 1 cm. PCNL reaches a stone-free rate between 60% and 100% for renal stones larger than 2 cm. Semirigid ureteroscopy renders patients with distal ureteral stones free in up to 94% of the cases compared to 74% of SWL. Regarding upper ureteral stones, ureteroscopy promotes stone-free rates between 77% and 91%and SWL between 41% and 82%.
Conclusion: The link between urinary stones, obesity and diabetes mellitus is well established. Non-contrast CT is the gold standard for diagnosis of urinary stones. SWL is the mainstay in the treatment of renal stones with less than 2 cm and density under 1000 Hounsfield Units, except for lower pole calculi where the limit is 1 cm. PCNL is the preferred method for treatment of renal stones larger than 2 cm. Semirigid ureteroscopy is the method of election for lower ureteral stones; flexible ureteroscopy is reserved for upper ureteral or renal stones with less than 1.5 cm non responsive to SWL or for those patients with contraindications to PCNL.
Similar articles
-
Imaging modalities and treatment of paediatric upper tract urolithiasis: A systematic review and update on behalf of the EAU urolithiasis guidelines panel.J Pediatr Urol. 2020 Oct;16(5):612-624. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 4. J Pediatr Urol. 2020. PMID: 32739360
-
Management of urinary stones: state of the art and future perspectives by experts in stone disease.Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024 Jun 27;96(2):12703. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2024.12703. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2024. PMID: 38934520 Review.
-
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3. J Urol. 2004. PMID: 15540749
-
Treatment selection for urolithiasis: percutaneous nephrolithomy, ureteroscopy, shock wave lithotripsy, and active monitoring.World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1395-1399. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2030-8. Epub 2017 Mar 16. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28303335 Review.
-
Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Versus Flexible Ureteroscopy for the Management of Upper Tract Urinary Stones in Children.J Endourol. 2017 Jan;31(1):1-6. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0313. J Endourol. 2017. PMID: 27824261
Cited by
-
The Role of Radiological Imaging in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Urolithiasis: A Narrative Review.Cureus. 2022 Dec 28;14(12):e33041. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33041. eCollection 2022 Dec. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36589703 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Metabolic investigation in patients with nephrolithiasis.Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017 Oct-Dec;15(4):452-456. doi: 10.1590/S1679-45082017AO4029. Epub 2017 Dec 18. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2017. PMID: 29267427 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources