Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 May;17(4):820-3.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-010-0309-z. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

AMEG: the new SETAC advisory group on aquatic macrophyte ecotoxicology

Affiliations

AMEG: the new SETAC advisory group on aquatic macrophyte ecotoxicology

Gertie Arts et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2010 May.

Abstract

Introduction and background: Primary producers play critical structural and functional roles in aquatic ecosystems; therefore, it is imperative that the potential risks of toxicants to aquatic plants are adequately assessed in the risk assessment of chemicals. The standard required macrophyte test species is the floating (non-sediment-rooted) duckweed Lemna spp. This macrophyte species might not be representative of all floating, rooted, emergent, and submerged macrophyte species because of differences in the duration and mode of exposure; sensitivity to the specific toxic mode of action of the chemical; and species-specific traits (e.g., duckweed's very short generation time).

Discussion and perspectives: These topics were addressed during the workshop entitled "Aquatic Macrophyte Risk Assessment for Pesticides" (AMRAP) where a risk assessment scheme for aquatic macrophytes was proposed. Four working groups evolved from this workshop and were charged with the task of developing Tier 1 and higher-tier aquatic macrophyte risk assessment procedures. Subsequently, a SETAC Advisory Group, the Macrophyte Ecotoxicology Group (AMEG) was formed as an umbrella organization for various macrophyte working groups. The purpose of AMEG is to provide scientifically based guidance in all aspects of aquatic macrophyte testing in the laboratory and field, including prospective as well as retrospective risk assessments for chemicals. As AMEG expands, it will begin to address new topics including bioremediation and sustainable management of aquatic macrophytes in the context of ecosystem services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Proposed decision scheme for aquatic macrophytes (modified from Maltby et al. (2010)) (PGR = Plant Growth Regulator; EC = Effect Concentration; PEC = Predicted Environmental Concentration)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brock TCM, Lahr J, Van den Brink PJ (2000) Ecological risks of pesticides in freshwater ecosystems, Part I: Herbicides. Alterra-Rapport 088, Wageningen, Alterra, Green World Research, The Netherlands
    1. EC Commission proposal for a council directive establishing Annex VI to Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of Plant Protection Products on the market. Off J Eur Comm C. 1997;240:1–23.
    1. EC (2002) Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology in the context of Directive 91/414/EEC. Sanco/3268/2001 rev 4 (final). European Commission Health & Consumer Protection Directorate-General, Brussels, Belgium
    1. EC Regulation No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing Council Directives 79/117/EEC and 91/414/EEC. Off J Eur Union L. 2009;309:1–50.
    1. Hanson ML, Arts GHP. Improving regulatory risk assessment—using aquatic macrophytes. In: Chapman PM (ed) Learned discourses. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 2007;3:466–467. doi: 10.1002/ieam.5630030321. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances