Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components
- PMID: 20194329
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.01349
Comparison of bone mineral density between porous tantalum and cemented tibial total knee arthroplasty components
Abstract
Background: Porous tantalum was recently introduced as a metallic implant material for total knee arthroplasty. Its porosity, low modulus of elasticity, and high frictional characteristics were expected to provide physiologic load transfer and relative preservation of bone stock. However, to our knowledge, the effect of a Trabecular Metal tibial component on bone mineral density has not been reported. The purpose of the present study was to compare the periprosthetic bone mineral density between patients managed with uncemented Trabecular Metal and cemented tibial components.
Methods: Twenty-eight knees receiving a Trabecular Metal tibial component and twenty-eight knees receiving a cemented cobalt-chromium tibial component had dual x-ray absorptiometry scans at two weeks preoperatively and at two weeks and six, twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months postoperatively, to assess periprosthetic bone mineral density. All of the operations were performed by one surgeon through a medial parapatellar approach.
Results: None of the differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative bone mineral density in the femoral neck, wrist, lumbar spine, or knee were significant. In both groups, the bone mineral density in the tibia decreased postoperatively. However, the postoperative decrease in bone mineral density in the lateral aspect of the tibia was significantly less in knees with Trabecular Metal components than in knees with cemented tibial components at twenty-four months (mean and standard deviation, -6.7% +/- 22.9% compared with -36.8% +/- 24.2%; p = 0.002). At twenty-four months postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the Knee Society score, range of motion of the knee, or bone mineral density in the lumbar spine. No prosthetic migration or periprosthetic fracture was detected in either group.
Conclusions: The decrease in bone mineral density of the lateral tibial plateau was less in knees with a Trabecular Metal tibial component following total knee arthroplasty than in knees with a cemented tibial component. Additional research is needed to determine whether long-term clinical benefits are realized with the use of porous tantalum tibial components for total knee arthroplasty.
Similar articles
-
Porous tantalum tibial component prevents periprosthetic loss of bone mineral density after total knee arthroplasty for five years-a matched cohort study.J Arthroplasty. 2013 Dec;28(10):1760-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.03.031. Epub 2013 Apr 30. J Arthroplasty. 2013. PMID: 23642446
-
Periprosthetic Loss of Bone Mineral Density After Cementless Porous Tantalum and Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Mean of 11-Year Concise Follow-Up of a Previous Report.J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3156-3160. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jun 12. J Arthroplasty. 2020. PMID: 32631727
-
Medial peg position of cementless porous tantalum tibial component affects bone mineral density around the prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty: 2-year follow-up study.Knee. 2022 Jan;34:55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.11.005. Epub 2021 Dec 4. Knee. 2022. PMID: 34875497
-
Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):666-674. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.011. Epub 2016 Sep 28. J Arthroplasty. 2017. PMID: 27776898 Review.
-
Porous tantalum in reconstructive surgery of the knee: a review.J Knee Surg. 2007 Jul;20(3):185-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248041. J Knee Surg. 2007. PMID: 17665779 Review.
Cited by
-
Tantalum Cementless Versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis of Level 1 Studies.J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023 Apr 7;7(4):e22.00219. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-22-00219. eCollection 2023 Apr 1. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2023. PMID: 37027225 Free PMC article.
-
The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):34-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3585-y. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015. PMID: 24687433 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Spatial mapping of humeral head bone density.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Sep;26(9):1653-1661. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 May 8. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017. PMID: 28495573 Free PMC article.
-
[Progress of change in bone mineral density after knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 15;35(1):124-129. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202006068. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021. PMID: 33448210 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Long-term results of a porous tantalum monoblock tibia component: clinical and radiographic results at follow-up of 10 years.Arthroplast Today. 2017 Apr 7;3(3):192-196. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2017.02.004. eCollection 2017 Sep. Arthroplast Today. 2017. PMID: 28913406 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical