Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Oct;42(10):1943-50.
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181d8f8fa.

Sex differences in fatigue resistance are muscle group dependent

Keith G Avin  1 , Maureen R Naughton, Brett W Ford, Haley E Moore, Maya N Monitto-Webber, Amy M Stark, A John Gentile, Laura A Frey Law
Affiliations

Sex differences in fatigue resistance are muscle group dependent

Keith G Avin et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Women are often reported to be generally more resistant to fatigue than men for relative-intensity tasks. This has been observed repeatedly for elbow flexors, whereas at the ankle, sex differences appear less robust, suggesting localized rather than systemic influences. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine sex differences in fatigue resistance at muscle groups in a single cohort and which factors, if any, predict endurance time.

Methods: Thirty-two young adults (age = 19-44 yr, 16 women) performed sustained isometric contractions at 50% maximum voluntary isometric contraction to failure for elbow flexion and ankle dorsiflexion. Pain, exertion, and muscle EMG were assessed throughout. Self-reported baseline activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.

Results: Women were significantly more resistant to fatigue than men at the elbow (112.3 ± 6.2 vs 80.3 ± 5.8 s, P = 0.001) but not at the ankle (140.6 ± 10.7 vs 129.2 ± 10.5 s, P = 0.45). Peak torque was greater in men than that in women (P < 0.0001) at the ankle (45.0 ± 1.7 vs 30.1 ± 1.0 N·m) and at the elbow (75.7 ± 3.1 vs 34.4 ± 2.2 N·m). Peak torque was significantly related to endurance time at the elbow (R2= 0.30) but not at the ankle (R2 = 0.03). Peak pain, rate of pain increase, peak exertion, EMG, and baseline physical activity did not differ between sexes.

Conclusions: Sex differences in fatigue resistance are muscle group specific. Women were more fatigue resistant at the elbow but not at the ankle during a sustained isometric contraction. Further, factors that may contribute to fatigue resistance for one muscle group (e.g., sex, peak torque) may not be critical at another.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (SEM) endurance time (A), peak torque (B), and peak torque normalized by body mass (C) for the ankle and elbow muscle groups by sex. * Significant difference between sexes (p < 0.05). + Significant difference between muscle groups (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Linear regressions of endurance time versus absolute (A, B) and normalized (C, D) peak torque are shown for the elbow flexors (A, C) and ankle dorsiflexors (B, D).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean EMG for ankle and elbow muscle groups by sex. * Significant difference over time for both muscle groups (p < 0.0001). + Significant difference between muscle groups (p < 0.05)
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean (SEM) peak pain (A), rate of pain increase per minute (B), peak exertion (C), and rate of exertion increase per minute (D) for ankle and elbow muscle groups and sex. * Significant difference between sexes (p < 0.05). + Significant difference between muscle groups (p < 0.05).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Borg G. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales. Human Kinetics; Champaign, IL: 1998. pp. 63–7.
    1. Calder KM, Stashuk DW, McLean L. Physiological characteristics of motor units in the brachioradialis muscle across fatiguing low-level isometric contractions. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008;18(1):2–15. - PubMed
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95. - PubMed
    1. Dimitrova NA, Arabadzhiev TI, Hogrel JY, Dimitrov GV. Fatigue analysis of interference EMG signals obtained from biceps brachii during isometric voluntary contraction at various force levels. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2009;19(2):252–8. - PubMed
    1. Dotan R, Falk B. Task-specific sex differences in muscle fatigue: is there a common underlying cause? Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(1):36. - PubMed

Publication types