Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain
- PMID: 20195199
- DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c142bf
Biomechanical comparison of iliac screws versus interbody femoral ring allograft on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain
Abstract
Study design: This study evaluates the effect of iliac screw fixation versus interbody femoral ring allograft (FRA) on lumbosacral kinematics and sacral screw strain in long segment instrumentations.
Objective: (1) Quantify kinematic properties of 3 lumbosacral fixation techniques; (2) Evaluate sacral screw strain as instrumented levels extend cephalad; and (3) Determine whether iliac screws or FRA biomechanically protect sacral screws.
Summary of background data: High failure rates at the lumbosacral junction have been reported with long posterior instrumentation ending with S1 pedicle screws. Achieving lumbosacral arthrodesis remains a clinical challenge.
Methods: Seven human cadavaric lumbosacral spines were biomechanically evaluated intact and in 3 instrumented conditions: pedicle screw fixation alone (pedicle screw group), pedicle screw fixation supplemented with iliac screws (iliac screw group), and pedicle screw fixation supplemented with FRA (allograft group). Each condition was tested spanning L5-S1, L4-S1, L3-S1, L2-S1, and L1-S1. Testing included pure unconstrained moments (±10 Nm) in axial rotation, flexion/extension, and lateral bending, with quantification of S1 screw strain and lumbosacral range of motion (ROM).
Results: Testing revealed decreasing lumbosacral ROM as instrumentation extended cephalad (P < 0.05). In axial rotation, ROM was markedly higher for the allograft group compared to pedicle screw and iliac screw groups with instrumentation to L4 (P < 0.05). In flexion/extension, length of instrumentation in each group correlated with ROM. As length of instrumentation increased, ROM decreased, particularly for the iliac screw group. In lateral bending, ROM decreased in all groups as instrumentation lengthened (P < 0.05). Strain on unprotected sacral screws increased in flexion, extension, and lateral bending as instrumentation extended to L3 (P < 0.05). Iliac screws reduced strain in constructs to L3 and above (P < 0.05). Allograft reduced strain when fixation reached L2, but was not as effective as iliac screws overall. Neither iliac screws nor allograft reduced strain in constructs terminating at L5 or L4. (P > 0.05) CONCLUSION.: For instrumented fusions extending above L3, sacral screws should be protected with supplemental iliac screws or FRA at L5-S1. Of the two, iliac screws appear more effective.
Similar articles
-
Biomechanical analysis of sacral screw strain and range of motion in long posterior spinal fixation constructs: effects of lumbosacral fixation strategies in reducing sacral screw strains.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Feb 1;37(3):E163-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ce9a7. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012. PMID: 21857409
-
Revision strategies for single- and two-level total disc arthroplasty procedures: a biomechanical perspective.Spine J. 2009 Sep;9(9):735-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.011. Epub 2009 May 28. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19477694
-
Biomechanical effect of 4-rod technique on lumbosacral fixation: an in vitro human cadaveric investigation.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E925-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182967968. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013. PMID: 23609200
-
MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Apr;41 Suppl 8:S44-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001465. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016. PMID: 26825792 Review.
-
Dual iliac screws in spinopelvic fixation: a systematic review.Eur Spine J. 2019 Sep;28(9):2053-2059. doi: 10.1007/s00586-019-06065-3. Epub 2019 Jul 12. Eur Spine J. 2019. PMID: 31300882
Cited by
-
Innovative sacropelvic fixation using iliac screws and triangular titanium implants.Eur Spine J. 2021 Dec;30(12):3763-3770. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07006-9. Epub 2021 Sep 25. Eur Spine J. 2021. PMID: 34562177
-
Failure in Lumbar Spinal Fusion and Current Management Modalities.Semin Plast Surg. 2021 Feb;35(1):54-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1726102. Epub 2021 May 10. Semin Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33994880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Fusion Length Requiring Spinopelvic Fixation in Lumbosacral Fusion with Anterior Column Support at L5-S1: Assessment of Fusion Status Using Computed Tomography.Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Feb;16(1):86-94. doi: 10.4055/cios23183. Epub 2024 Jan 15. Clin Orthop Surg. 2024. PMID: 38304217 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanics of L5/S1 in Long Thoracolumbosacral Constructs: A Cadaveric Study.Global Spine J. 2018 Sep;8(6):607-614. doi: 10.1177/2192568218759037. Epub 2018 Mar 20. Global Spine J. 2018. PMID: 30202715 Free PMC article.
-
Challenges and Complications in Freehand S2-Alar-Iliac Spinopelvic Fixation and the Potential for Robotics to Enhance Patient Safety.Global Spine J. 2022 Apr;12(2_suppl):45S-52S. doi: 10.1177/21925682211036664. Global Spine J. 2022. PMID: 35393876 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials