Current immunosuppressive approaches in liver transplantation
- PMID: 20195232
Current immunosuppressive approaches in liver transplantation
Abstract
A significant increase of potent immunosuppressive agents over the last two decades has contributed to improved patient and graft survival after liver transplantation (LT). Numerous ongoing studies aim to determine the most effective immunosuppressive protocols while minimizing drug-related side effects. These protocols often combine several drugs with different mechanisms of action and toxicities allowing dosage adjustment. There is also a trend towards tailored immunosuppressive regimens according to the etiology of liver disease and comorbidities such as renal dysfunction and cardiovascular disease. The introduction of antibody induction therapies and antimetabolites resulted in an increasing number of studies with steroid minimization and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) reduction protocols. Combined mycophenolate mofetil and minimal dose CNI therapy has shown to be safe and to improve kidney function and cardiovascular risk profile in the majority of studies. Sirolimus (SRL) and everolimus constitute a new class of compounds designated as the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, which exhibit immunosuppressive and antiproliferative effects. There are conflicting results with respect to renal improvement upon switch to mTOR inhibitor therapy with concomitant reduction/elimination of CNI. Further trials will determine whether earlier conversion to mTOR inhibitors enable prevention of CNI-related renal dysfunction. Future results from randomized controlled studies will also show whether SRL can improve recurrence-free survival in patients transplanted for hepatocellular carcinoma.
Similar articles
-
mTOR inhibitor/proliferation signal inhibitors: entering or leaving the field?J Nephrol. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):133-42. J Nephrol. 2010. PMID: 20155724 Review.
-
Early sirolimus therapy in renal transplant recipients at high risk: is it justified?Transplant Proc. 2009 Sep;41(7):2784-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.07.015. Transplant Proc. 2009. PMID: 19765435
-
The role and value of sirolimus administration in kidney and liver transplantation.Clin Transplant. 2006;20 Suppl 17:30-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2006.00598.x. Clin Transplant. 2006. PMID: 17100699 Review.
-
Long-term maintenance therapy with calcineurin inhibitors: an update.Transplant Proc. 2010 Nov;42(9 Suppl):S21-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.09.015. Transplant Proc. 2010. PMID: 21095445 Review.
-
Operational tolerance: past lessons and future prospects.Liver Transpl. 2011 Mar;17(3):222-32. doi: 10.1002/lt.22265. Liver Transpl. 2011. PMID: 21384504 Review.
Cited by
-
Genetic and Life Style Risk Factors for Recurrent Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Following Liver Transplantation.Front Nutr. 2022 Jan 14;8:787430. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.787430. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2022. PMID: 35096933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Host and immunosuppression-related factors influencing fibrosis occurrence post liver transplantation.Front Pharmacol. 2022 Oct 18;13:1042664. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1042664. eCollection 2022. Front Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 36330082 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous