Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Jun;18(2):88-92.
doi: 10.1007/s12529-010-9083-z.

Initial psychological responses to swine flu

Affiliations

Initial psychological responses to swine flu

Robin Goodwin et al. Int J Behav Med. 2011 Jun.

Abstract

Background: The emergence of influenza A ("swine flu") in early 2009 led to widespread public concern. However, little research has examined the factors that underlie initial worry about infection and subsequent behavioral responses to such worry.

Purpose: This study seeks to model some key predictors of worry and behavioral responses in the early stages of the swine flu pandemic (WHO pandemic stage 5).

Method: A cross-sectional internet questionnaire study (N = 186).

Results: Twenty-five percent of respondents rated themselves as worried about being a victim of swine flu, 40% that they were worried of a family member contracting the virus. Twenty percent had bought, or intended to buy, preparatory materials (e.g., face masks), 20% intended to delay or cancel air travel. In a structural equation model, conservation values and family or friends perception of risks predicted worry about infection, while worry correlated with the purchase of preparatory materials, a lesser willingness to travel by public transport, and difficulty in focusing on everyday activities.

Conclusion: While previous research on pandemic risk perception has focused on cognitive risk judgments, our data suggests that initial "emotional" concerns about infection are also significant predictors of behavioral responses to pandemic threat. Such worry is likely to be influenced by a variety of individual factors, such as personal values, as well as normative pressures. Practitioners can use and expand on such models of pandemic response when tailoring health campaigns to meet newly emergent threats.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Concern about swine flu and its consequences. N = 156; x 2 = 33.61, df = 33.0; ns. Single asterisk indicates p < .05. Double asterisks indicate p < 0.01

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Reducing excess mortality from common illnesses during an influenza pandemic. 2008. http://www.who.int/diseasecontrol_emergencies/common_illnesses2008_6.pdf. Accessed 20th June 2009. - PubMed
    1. Lau TFJ, Kim JH, Tsui HY, Griffiths S. Perceptions related to bird-to-human avian influenza, influenza vaccination, and use of face mask. Infection. 2008;36:434–43. doi: 10.1007/s15010-008-7277-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blendon RJ, Benson JM, DesRoches CM, Raleigh E, Taylor-Clark K. The public’s response so severe acute respiratory syndrome in Toronto and the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:925–31. doi: 10.1086/382355. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cummings KM, Jette AM, Brock BM, Haefner DP. Psychosocial determinants of immunization behaviour in a swine influenza campaign. Med Care. 1979;17:639–49. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197906000-00008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leppin A, Aro AR. Risk perceptions related to SARS and avian influenza: theoretical foundations of current empirical research. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16:7–29. doi: 10.1007/s12529-008-9002-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed