Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction
- PMID: 20196066
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.7605
Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction
Abstract
Objective: To review the performance of a variety of biometry formulae for estimated fetal weight (EFW) in the management of severely growth restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler at a single perinatal institution.
Methods: Forty-three pregnancies were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were: chromosomally/ structurally normal fetus; complete ultrasound biometry at < or = 7 days from delivery; EFW < 10(th) centile; absent/reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical arteries; and delivery at < 32 + 6 weeks. EFW accuracy and precision were compared among nine formulae utilizing combinations of head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL) measurements.
Results: Twenty-six (60.5%) fetuses showed asymmetric growth (HC/AC ratio > 95(th) centile). Analysis of the systematic and random errors associated with each formula showed that the birth weight of asymmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by the Hadlock equation that utilized BPD and AC measurements only. The birth weight of symmetrically-grown fetuses was most closely approximated by EFW derived from Hadlock equations that utilized > or = three biometry measurements, including FL. Incorporation of FL into Hadlock formulae led to significant underestimation of birth weight in the fetuses with asymmetric growth (mean percentage error +/- SD: EFW(FL-AC), -13.3 +/- 9.8%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), -10.8 +/- 9.8%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), -11.8 +/- 9.3%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), -11.7 +/- 9.5%; P < 0.001). The same equations were accurate in fetuses with symmetric growth (EFW(FL-AC), 3.1 +/- 10.0%; EFW(BPD-FL-AC), 1.0 +/- 8.9%; EFW(HC-FL-AC), 0.3 +/- 8.7%; EFW(BPD-HC-FL-AC), 0.4 +/- 15.5%). Use of the best performing equation (Hadlock 3), which does not include FL, to estimate weight in asymmetrically-grown fetuses over 28 weeks' gestation, would have reduced the proportion of those with an underestimation of fetal weight of > 100 g from nine (50.0%) to three (16.7%).
Conclusions: Biometry methods that exclude FL should be considered in asymmetric intrauterine growth restriction associated with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms.
Copyright 2009 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):44-51. doi: 10.1002/uog.19073. Epub 2018 May 30. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29696704
-
Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;52(1):35-43. doi: 10.1002/uog.19066. Epub 2018 Jun 3. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29611251
-
Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Oct;193:10-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015. PMID: 26207980
-
Fetal growth velocity and body proportion in the assessment of growth.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2S):S700-S711.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.014. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29422209 Review.
-
Sonographic diagnosis of IUGR-macrosomia.Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Mar;35(1):172-84. doi: 10.1097/00003081-199203000-00022. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1544242 Review.
Cited by
-
Prediction of Late-Onset Small for Gestational Age and Fetal Growth Restriction by Fetal Biometry at 35 Weeks and Impact of Ultrasound-Delivery Interval: Comparison of Six Fetal Growth Standards.J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 3;10(13):2984. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132984. J Clin Med. 2021. PMID: 34279466 Free PMC article.
-
International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;49(4):478-486. doi: 10.1002/uog.17347. Epub 2017 Mar 5. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 27804212 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources