Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr;45(4):326-32.
doi: 10.1002/ppul.21183.

Is home spirometry useful in diagnosing asthma in children with nonspecific respiratory symptoms?

Affiliations

Is home spirometry useful in diagnosing asthma in children with nonspecific respiratory symptoms?

Alwin F J Brouwer et al. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Variation of lung function is considered to be a hallmark of asthma. Although guidelines recommend measuring it as a diagnostic tool for asthma, the usefulness of this approach has not been studied in children.

Aim: To assess the usefulness of home spirometry in children with nonspecific lower respiratory tract symptoms, to diagnose or exclude asthma.

Methods: In school-aged children, referred by their general practitioner because of chronic respiratory symptoms of unknown origin, the diagnosis of asthma was made or excluded by a pediatric pulmonologist (gold standard), based on international guidelines and a standardized protocol. Additionally, children measured peak expiratory flow (PEF) and forced expiratory flow in 1 sec (FEV(1)) twice daily for 2 weeks on a home spirometer, from which diurnal variation was calculated. These results (index test) were not revealed to the pediatric pulmonologist. The value of home spirometry to diagnose asthma was calculated.

Results: Sixty-one children (27 boys) were included (mean age: 10.4 years; range: 6-16 years). Between asthma and no asthma, the mean difference in PEF variation was 4.4% (95% CI: 0.9-7.9; P = 0.016) and in FEV(1) variation 4.5% (95% CI: 1.6-7.4; P = 0.003). Sensitivity and specificity, based on the 95th-centile of the reference values for PEF and FEV(1) variation (12.3% and 11.8%, respectively) were 50% and 72% for PEF variation and 45% and 92% for FEV(1) variation. The likelihood ratio was 1.8 for PEF and 5.6 for FEV(1).

Conclusions: The contribution of home spirometry in the diagnostic process for asthma in schoolchildren with nonspecific respiratory symptoms is limited.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types