Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;13(9B):3209-17.
doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2009.00662.x.

Toll-like receptor stimulation differentially regulates vasoactive intestinal peptide type 2 receptor in macrophages

Affiliations

Toll-like receptor stimulation differentially regulates vasoactive intestinal peptide type 2 receptor in macrophages

Juan Luis Herrera et al. J Cell Mol Med. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) was originally isolated as a vasodilator intestinal peptide, then as a neuropeptide. In the immune system, VIP is described as an endogenous macrophage-deactivating factor. VIP exerts its immunological actions in a paracrine and/or autocrine manner, through specific receptors. However, very little is known about the molecular regulation of VIP type 2 receptor (VPAC(2)) in the immune system. We now report that different toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands selectively regulate the VPAC(2) receptor gene and show a gene repression system controlled by key protein kinase signalling cascades in macrophages. VPAC(2) gene expression is regulated by gram-positive (TLR2 ligands) and gram-negative bacteria wall constituents (TLR4 ligands). Moreover, VPAC(2) is tightly regulated: TLR2- or TLR2/6- but not TLR2/1-mediated mechanisms are responsible for the induction of VPAC(2). TLR stimulation by viral or bacterial nucleic acids did not modify the VPAC(2) mRNA levels. Remarkably, imiquimod--a synthetic TLR7 ligand--led to a potent up-regulation of VPAC(2) gene expression. TLR5 stimulation by flagellin present in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria did not affect VPAC(2) mRNA. The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activity accounted for the TLR4-mediated induction of VPAC(2) gene expression. Surprisingly, our data strongly suggest for the first time a tightly repressed control of VPAC(2) mRNA induction by elements downstream of MAPK kinase 1/2, PI3K/Akt, and particularly Jun-NH(2)-terminal kinase signalling pathways.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differential TLRs regulation of VPAC2 mRNA in macrophages. (A) Raw 264.7 cells were seeded into 12-well plates in a final volume of 2 ml. At 70–80% confluence (750,000 cells/well), cells were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml), CpG+ (1 μg/ml, CpG-DNA 1668: 5′-TCCATGACGTTCCTGATGCT-3′), Poly (I: C) acid (50 μg/ml), LTA (10 μg/ml), Pam3 CSK4 (300 ng/ml), FSL-1 (1 μg/ml), PGN (10 μg/ml), imiquimod (10 μg/ml) or ssRNA40 (0.25 μg/ml). Twenty-four hours, RNA was extracted and qPCR of VPAC2 was carried out. Results are the mean ± S.D. of five independent experiments performed in triplicate. (Inset) Samples from qPCR samples on 1.7% agarose gel electrophoresis. Lanes showed the DNA molecular size markers (M), reaction performed in the absence of RT (–) and presence (+) of RT from resting Raw 264.7 RNA. (B) Female C57BL6/JIco (n= 20) peritoneal macrophages were isolated and pooled after i.p. injection of thioglycolate medium at day 5 as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. For qPCR determinations of VPAC2 mRNA levels, cDNA (100 ng) was amplified as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Quantitative PCR results were obtained using the ΔΔCt method [25]. The induction of mRNA was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt (normalized for HPRT as housekeeping gene). For statistical evaluation, Mann-Whitney rank sum tests were performed. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*, P < 0.05 versus control; **, P < 0.01 versus control; ***, P < 0.001 versus control).
Figure 2
Figure 2
IL-6 production after TLRs stimulation in macrophages. (A) Raw 264.7 cells were seeded into 12-well plates in a final volume of 2 ml. At 70–80% confluence, cells (750,000 cells/well) were stimulated with LPS (1 μg/ml), CpG+ (1 μg/ml, CpG-DNA 1668: 5′-TCCATGACGTTCCTGATGCT-3′), Poly (I: C) acid (50 μg/ml), LTA (10 μg/ml), Pam3 CSK4 (300 ng/ml), FSL-1 (1 μg/ml), PGN (10 μg/ml), imiquimod (10 μg/ml) or ssRNA40 (0.25 μg/ml). Twenty-four hours later, supernatants were harvested for IL-6 ELISA determination. (B) mRNA IL-6 stimulation after ssRNA treatment in Raw 264.7 cells. RNA was extracted for IL-6 gene expression study after ssRNA treatment as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. For qPCR determinations of IL-6 mRNA levels, cDNA (100 ng) was amplified as described in the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Quantitative PCR results were obtained using the ΔΔCt method [25]. The induction of mRNA was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt. Results are the mean ± S.D. of five independent experiments performed in triplicate. (C) Female C57BL6/JIco (n= 20) peritoneal macrophages were isolated and pooled after intraperitoneal injection of 1 ml of 3% thioglycolate at day 5 as described above. Afterwards, non-adherent cells were removed and peritoneal macrophages were treated as indicated above and 24 hrs later, supernatants were harvested for IL-6 ELISA determination.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of protein kinase inhibitors on TLR-mediated VPAC2 regulation in Raw 264.7 macrophages. Raw 264.7 cells were grown and treated as above. Briefly, at 70–80% confluence, cells (750,000 cells/well) were stimulated for 24 hrs with LPS (1 μg/ml), LTA (10 μg/ml), PGN (10 μg/ml) or imiquimod (10 μg/ml) after 30 min. pre-treatment in the presence or absence of 10 μM SB203580 (a p38 MAPK inhibitor), 25 μM SP600125 (a JNK inhibitor), 50 μM PD98059 (a MEK1/2 inhibitor) and 10 μM LY294002 (a PI3K/Akt inhibitor). Twenty-four hours later, RNA was extracted and qPCR of VPAC2 was carried out according to the ‘Materials and methods’ section. Results are the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. For statistical evaluation, Mann-Whitney rank sum tests were performed. Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.0001 versus the experimental condition in the absence of inhibitor).
Figure 4
Figure 4
TLR-mediated control of VPAC2. (A) VPAC2 up-regulation by TLRs represents an additional mechanism to ensure the modulator capabilities of VIP while at the same time a down-regulation of TLRs occurs. (B) Distribution of putative binding sites for transcription factors involved in TLR signalling across the 3000 long upstream region of mouse VPAC2 gene. Thicker lines correspond to more densely packed putative binding sites.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson P, Delgado M. Endogenous anti-inflammatory neuropeptides and proresolving lipid mediators: a new therapeutic approach for immune disorders. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1830–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pozo D. Immune-based disorders: the challenges for translational immunology. J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1085–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gonzalez-Rey E, Chorny A, Delgado M. Regulation of immune tolerance by anti-inflammatory neuropeptides. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7:52–63. - PubMed
    1. Pozo D, Delgado M. The many faces of VIP in neuroimmunology: a cytokine rather a neuropeptide. FASEB J. 2004;18:1325–34. - PubMed
    1. Martinez C, Delgado M, Abad C, et al. Regulation of VIP production and secretion by murine lymphocytes. J Neuroimmunol. 1999;93:126–38. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances