Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 16;102(6):972-80.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605566. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment

Affiliations

Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment

L Hol et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Guidelines underline the role of individual preferences in the selection of a screening test, as insufficient evidence is available to recommend one screening test over another. We conducted a study to determine the preferences of individuals and to predict uptake for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes using various screening tests.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) questionnaire was distributed among naive subjects, yet to be screened, and previously screened subjects, aged 50-75 years. Subjects were asked to choose between scenarios on the basis of faecal occult blood test (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), total colonoscopy (TC) with various test-specific screening intervals and mortality reductions, and no screening (opt-out).

Results: In total, 489 out of 1498 (33%) screening-naïve subjects (52% male; mean age+/-s.d. 61+/-7 years) and 545 out of 769 (71%) previously screened subjects (52% male; mean age+/-s.d. 61+/-6 years) returned the questionnaire. The type of screening test, screening interval, and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality influenced subjects' preferences (all P<0.05). Screening-naive and previously screened subjects equally preferred 5-yearly FS and 10-yearly TC (P=0.24; P=0.11), but favoured both strategies to annual FOBT screening (all P-values <0.001) if, based on the literature, realistic risk reduction of CRC-related mortality was applied. Screening-naive and previously screened subjects were willing to undergo a 10-yearly TC instead of a 5-yearly FS to obtain an additional risk reduction of CRC-related mortality of 45% (P<0.001).

Conclusion: These data provide insight into the extent by which interval and risk reduction of CRC-related mortality affect preferences for CRC screening tests. Assuming realistic test characteristics, subjects in the target population preferred endoscopic screening over FOBT screening, partly, due to the more favourable risk reduction of CRC-related mortality by endoscopy screening. Increasing the knowledge of potential screenees regarding risk reduction by different screening strategies is, therefore, warranted to prevent unrealistic expectations and to optimise informed choice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study profile. gFOBT=guaiac-based faecal occult blood test; FIT=immunochemical faecal occult blood test; FS=flexible sigmoidoscopy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferences for the different screening strategies at a long (–––), intermediate (---) and short (—) screening interval and different levels of mortality risk reduction for screening-naive and previously screened subjects. FOBT=faecal occult blood test; CRC=colorectal cancer. *Preferences for long and intermediate screening interval were similar.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of changing the screening programme characteristics on the average probability of uptake for, respectively, FOBT (45%), FS (58%) and TC (58%) in screening-naive subjects.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cantor SB, Volk RJ, Cass AR, Gilani J, Spann SJ (2002) Psychological benefits of prostate cancer screening: the role of reassurance. Health Expect 5: 104–113 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Commission of the European Communities. Proposal for a Council Recommendation on Cancer Screening, 2003/0093 (CNS). Brussel, 5 May 2003
    1. DeBourcy AC, Lichtenberger S, Felton S, Butterfield KT, Ahnen DJ, Denberg TD (2008) Community-based preferences for stool cards versus colonoscopy in colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 23: 169–174 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dolan P (1997) Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35: 1095–1108 - PubMed
    1. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A (2002) Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. BMJ 324: 827–830 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms