Out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab therapy: from the perspective of metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Japan
- PMID: 20198398
- DOI: 10.1007/s10147-010-0045-x
Out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab therapy: from the perspective of metastatic colorectal cancer patients in Japan
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of our study was to estimate the out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) or XELOX plus bevacizumab from the perspective of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).
Methods: Based on the NO16966 and NO16967 trials, the mean out-of-pocket payment was calculated from patient-level data. Out-of-pocket payments for 16 cycles (11 months) of first-line chemotherapy and 8 cycles (5 months) of second-line chemotherapy were included. In addition, incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for first-line bevacizumab were calculated by dividing the difference of the out-of-pocket payment by the difference of the mean number of progression-free survival (PFS) years or quality-adjusted PFS (QAPFS) years.
Results: The mean out-of-pocket payments for middle-income patients under 70 years of age were JPY 328,000 for 16 cycles of first-line XELOX and JPY 376,000 for XELOX plus bevacizumab. The mean out-of-pocket payment for 8 cycles of second-line XELOX was calculated to be JPY 175,000. Middle-income patients over 70 years of age were required to pay JPY 61,000 and JPY 72,000 for first-line XELOX and XELOX plus bevacizumab, respectively. The ICERs of middle-income patients <70 years of age were JPY 430,000/PFS-year and JPY 720,000/QAPFS-year, and those of middle-income patients >70 years of age were JPY 100,000/PFS-year and JPY 170,000/QAPFS-year.
Conclusions: We clarified the out-of-pocket payment and cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy of MCRC patients in Japan. Our previous survey shows it is highly possible that many patients prefer to pay that incremental out-of-pocket payment to gain one additional QAPFS year. However, our cost-effectiveness analysis was not conducted from the perspective of society or healthcare payers.
Similar articles
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of XELOX for metastatic colorectal cancer based on the NO16966 and NO16967 trials.Br J Cancer. 2009 Jul 7;101(1):12-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605114. Epub 2009 Jun 2. Br J Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19491895 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
First-line XELOX plus bevacizumab followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase III MACRO TTD study.Oncologist. 2012;17(1):15-25. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0249. Epub 2012 Jan 10. Oncologist. 2012. PMID: 22234633 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan.Clin Ther. 2007 Oct;29(10):2256-67. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.10.013. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 18042483
-
Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2010 Oct;14(Suppl. 2):47-53. doi: 10.3310/hta14suppl2/07. Health Technol Assess. 2010. PMID: 21047491 Review.
-
Bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a NICE single technology appraisal.Pharmacoeconomics. 2012 Dec 1;30(12):1119-32. doi: 10.2165/11597210-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2012. PMID: 23058097 Review.
Cited by
-
Increased financial burden among patients with chronic myelogenous leukaemia receiving imatinib in Japan: a retrospective survey.BMC Cancer. 2012 Apr 24;12:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-152. BMC Cancer. 2012. PMID: 22530992 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone in previously untreated advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Cancer. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):677. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2734-y. BMC Cancer. 2016. PMID: 27558497 Free PMC article.
-
The Out-of-Pocket Cost Burden of Cancer Care-A Systematic Literature Review.Curr Oncol. 2021 Mar 15;28(2):1216-1248. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28020117. Curr Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33804288 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Up To Three Lines of Chemotherapy Treatment Plans for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.MDM Policy Pract. 2017 Aug 30;2(2):2381468317729650. doi: 10.1177/2381468317729650. eCollection 2017 Jul-Dec. MDM Policy Pract. 2017. PMID: 30288431 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical