No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups
- PMID: 20198405
- PMCID: PMC2837808
- DOI: 10.1007/s10195-010-0082-2
No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups
Abstract
Background: Even though there are multiple studies documenting the outcome of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty as well as abundant studies on uncemented arthroplasties, there is a dearth of comparative studies of the uncemented acetabular component and a cemented component. In this study we aimed to document the long-term clinical and radiographic outcome as well as component survival in a randomized controlled trial.
Materials and methods: Two hundred fifteen patients (240 hips) were randomly allocated to receive a cemented Charnley cup or uncemented Duraloc 1200 cup. All patients received cemented Charnley stems and were evaluated clinically and radiographically after 6 months, and 2, 5, and 10 years.
Results: Harris Hip Scores improved from 48.3 [95% confidence interval (CI) 45.0-51.6] to 90.2 [95% CI 87.9-92.6] in the Charnley group and from 49.3 [95% CI 86.9-91.3] in the Duraloc group at 6 months. After 10 years, the Charnley group's Harris Hip Score was 89.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) 87.0-92.6], and the Duraloc group's score was 87.3 (95% CI 84.1-90.6). In the radiographic analysis after 10 years, there was no statistical difference in the prevalence of radiographic signs of loosening. Nine cups were revised in the Charnley group, and five cups were removed in the Duraloc group. The difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistical difference between the cups when aseptic loosening was the end-point, nor in survival analyses.
Conclusions: There is no statistically significant difference in clinical or radiological outcome between the Charnley cup and the Duraloc after 10 years, and no difference in implant survival after 12-14 years. The uncemented Duraloc cup is as good as the cemented Charnley cup after 10 years.
Figures
Similar articles
-
[Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018;85(1):46-53. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2018. PMID: 30257769 Slovak.
-
The long-term results of Charnley low-friction arthroplasty in young patients who have congenital dislocation, degenerative osteoarthrosis, or rheumatoid arthritis.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Nov;79(11):1599-617. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199711000-00001. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997. PMID: 9384419
-
[Total hip replacement in osteoarthritis with acetabular protrusion].Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003;70(5):296-302. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2003. PMID: 14669592 Czech.
-
Migration patterns of acetabular cups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies.Acta Orthop. 2023 Dec 29;94:626-634. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2023.24580. Acta Orthop. 2023. PMID: 38157007 Free PMC article.
-
The accuracy and reliability of preoperative digital 2D templating in prosthesis size prediction in uncemented versus cemented total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Nov 19;6(11):1020-1039. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.210048. eCollection 2021 Nov. EFORT Open Rev. 2021. PMID: 34909222 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Total hip replacement for the treatment of end stage arthritis of the hip: a systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2014 Jul 8;9(7):e99804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099804. eCollection 2014. PLoS One. 2014. PMID: 25003202 Free PMC article.
-
A prospective osseointegration retrieval analysis of second generation cementless shells.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jun 3;30:101914. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101914. eCollection 2022 Jul. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022. PMID: 35734018 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Migration characteristics and early clinical results of a novel-finned press-fit acetabular cup.Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014 Apr;126(7-8):208-11. doi: 10.1007/s00508-013-0488-y. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014. PMID: 24442859 Clinical Trial.
-
Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2217-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3. Epub 2014 Apr 4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24700446 Free PMC article.
-
The use of acetabular screws in total hip arthroplasty and its influence on wear and periacetabular osteolysis in the long-term follow-up.Int Orthop. 2022 Apr;46(4):717-722. doi: 10.1007/s00264-021-05219-7. Epub 2021 Sep 28. Int Orthop. 2022. PMID: 34581866 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:963–974 - PubMed
-
- Harris WH (2003) Results of uncemented cups: a critical appraisal at 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121–125 - PubMed
-
- Illgen R, Rubash HE. The optimal fixation of the cementless acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002;10:43–56. - PubMed
-
- Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:171–177 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical