Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;10(7):1621-33.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03039.x. Epub 2010 Feb 25.

Database comparison of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry

Affiliations

Database comparison of the adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study (A2ALL) and the SRTR U.S. Transplant Registry

B W Gillespie et al. Am J Transplant. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Data submitted by transplant programs to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) are used by the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) for policy development, performance evaluation and research. This study compared OPTN/SRTR data with data extracted from medical records by research coordinators from the nine-center A2ALL study. A2ALL data were collected independently of OPTN data submission (48 data elements among 785 liver transplant candidates/recipients; 12 data elements among 386 donors). At least 90% agreement occurred between OPTN/SRTR and A2ALL for 11/29 baseline recipient elements, 4/19 recipient transplant or follow-up elements and 6/12 donor elements. For the remaining recipient and donor elements, >10% of values were missing in OPTN/SRTR but present in A2ALL, confirming that missing data were largely avoidable. Other than variables required for allocation, the percentage missing varied widely by center. These findings support an expanded focus on data quality control by OPTN/SRTR for a broader variable set than those used for allocation. Center-specific monitoring of missing values could substantially improve the data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Boxplot distributions of percent missing for OPTN/SRTR data from all U.S. liver transplant centers for several recipient candidate variables tested in SRTR analytic models (2009 data). (Func Status = functional status by New York Heart Association scale; Vari Bld = variceal bleed; Up Ab Surg = upper abdominal surgery; HTN = hypertension.) Boxes show the 25th to 75th percentiles, “+” = mean, and bar across box = median. Whiskers extend to the data point closest to the center within 1.5*IQR (interquartile range) from each box end, and values beyond these points are shown individually.

Comment in

References

    1. National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) Title 42, United States Code (USC), beginning Section 273

    1. Final Rule - Federal Register Notice for the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Oct 20, 1999.
    1. Freeman RB, Jr., Wiesner RH, Roberts JP, McDiarmid S, Dykstra DM, Merion RM. Improving liver allocation: MELD and PELD. Am J Transplant. 2004;4(Suppl 9):114–31. - PubMed
    1. Little RJA, Rubin DB. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data. 2nd edition John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; Hoboken, New Jersey: 2002.
    1. SRTR website. [Accessed June 17, 2009]. Available at: www.ustransplant.org/annual_Reports/

Publication types