Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb;92(1):13-23.
doi: 10.1017/S0016672310000029. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Mapping interacting QTL for count phenotypes using hierarchical Poisson and binomial models: an application to reproductive traits in mice

Affiliations

Mapping interacting QTL for count phenotypes using hierarchical Poisson and binomial models: an application to reproductive traits in mice

Jun Li et al. Genet Res (Camb). 2010 Feb.

Abstract

We proposed hierarchical Poisson and binomial models for mapping multiple interacting quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for count traits in experimental crosses. We applied our methods to two counted reproductive traits, live fetuses (LF) and dead fetuses (DF) at 17 days gestation, in an F2 female mouse population. We treated observed number of corpora lutea (ovulation rate) as the baseline and the total trials in our Poisson and binomial models, respectively. We detected more than 10 QTLs for LF and DF, most having epistatic and pleiotropic effects. The epistatic effects were larger, involved more QTLs, and explained a larger proportion of phenotypic variance than the main effects. Our analyses revealed a complex network of multiple interacting QTLs for the reproductive traits, and increase our understanding of the genetic architecture of reproductive characters. The proposed statistical models and methods provide valuable tools for detecting multiple interacting QTLs for complex count phenotypes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histograms of numbers of live fetuses (LF), dead fetuses (DF), and ovulation rate (OR) (also called corpora lutea).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Poisson main-effect (left) and epistatic (right) models for live fetuses (LF): estimated effects with ± 1 standard errors (dots and short lines), p-values (rescaled as −log10 p/10) (triangles), and deviance and AIC. The notation for additive effect (C@h)a dominance effect (C@h)d, indicates chromosome C and position h cM. The term X1:X2 represents interaction between X1 and X2. The two gray lines indicate the p-values of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Poisson main-effect model without model search for live fetuses (LF): estimated effects with ± 1 standard errors (dots and short lines), and p-values (rescaled as −log10 p/10) (triangles). The notation for additive effect (C@h)a dominance effect (C@h)d, indicates chromosome C and position h cM. The term X1:X2 represents interaction between X1 and X2. The two gray lines indicate the p-values of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Binomial main-effect (left) and epistatic (right) models for live fetuses (LF): estimated effects with ± 1 standard errors (dots and short lines), p-values (rescaled as −log10 p/10) (triangles), and deviance and AIC. The notation for additive effect (C@h)a dominance effect (C@h)d, indicates chromosome C and position h cM. The term X1:X2 represents interaction between X1 and X2. The two gray lines indicate the p-values of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Poisson main-effect (left) and epistatic (right) models for dead fetuses (DF): estimated effects with ± 1 standard errors (dots and short lines), p-values (rescaled as −log10 p/10) (triangles), and deviance and AIC. The notation for additive effect (C@h)a dominance effect (C@h)d, indicates chromosome C and position h cM. The term X1:X2 represents interaction between X1 and X2. The two gray lines indicate the p-values of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Binomial main-effect (left) and epistatic (right) models for dead fetuses (DF): estimated effects with ± 1 standard errors (dots and short lines), p-values (rescaled as −log10 p/10) (triangles), and deviance and AIC. The notation for additive effect (C@h)a dominance effect (C@h)d, indicates chromosome C and position h cM. The term X1:X2 represents interaction between X1 and X2. The two gray lines indicate the p-values of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Treating discrete live fetuses (LF) and dead fetuses (DF) as normally continuous traits. a. main-effect model for LF; b. epistatic model for LF; c. main-effect model for DF; d. epistatic model for DF; estimated effects with ± 1 standard errors (dots and short lines), p-values (rescaled as −log10 p/10) (triangles), and deviance and AIC. The notation for additive effect (C@h)a dominance effect (C@h)d, indicates chromosome C and position h cM. The term X1:X2 represents interaction between X1 and X2. The two gray lines indicate the p-values of 0.05 and 0.001, respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Avalos E, Smith C. Genetic improvement of litter size in pigs. Anim. Prod. 1987;44:153–164.
    1. Bennett GL, Leymaster KA. Integration of ovulation rate, potential embryonic viability and uterine capacity into a model of litter size in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1989;67:1230–1241. - PubMed
    1. Carlborg Ö, Haley CS. Epistasis: too often neglected in complex trait studies? Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004;5:618–625. - PubMed
    1. Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical Inference. Ed. 2. Duxbury Press; Belmont: 2001.
    1. Cassady JP, Johnson RK, Pomp D, Rohrer GA, Van Vleck LD, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci affecting reproduction in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;79:623–633. - PubMed

Publication types