Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Apr 15;26(8):1112-8.
doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq099. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

Modeling sample variables with an Experimental Factor Ontology

Affiliations

Modeling sample variables with an Experimental Factor Ontology

James Malone et al. Bioinformatics. .

Abstract

Motivation: Describing biological sample variables with ontologies is complex due to the cross-domain nature of experiments. Ontologies provide annotation solutions; however, for cross-domain investigations, multiple ontologies are needed to represent the data. These are subject to rapid change, are often not interoperable and present complexities that are a barrier to biological resource users.

Results: We present the Experimental Factor Ontology, designed to meet cross-domain, application focused use cases for gene expression data. We describe our methodology and open source tools used to create the ontology. These include tools for creating ontology mappings, ontology views, detecting ontology changes and using ontologies in interfaces to enhance querying. The application of reference ontologies to data is a key problem, and this work presents guidelines on how community ontologies can be presented in an application ontology in a data-driven way.

Availability: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/efo.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
EFO upper level structure used to organize the ontology with intermediate node examples.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Separating the ontology layer (EFO) from the data (ArrayExpress) and the presentation layers (Atlas).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Added value relations between classes in EFO. The figure illustrates the existential restrictions (i.e. one or more relationship) placed on some of the subclasses of the classes shown (classes shown in boxes).
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Gene Expression Atlas Query for genes under- or overexpressed in mammalian ‘craniofacial tissues’.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Ontology-enabled search using EFO, showing query expansion for keyword ‘cancer’ with breast carcinoma selected. Subtypes (red), synonyms (green) and matches to the search term (yellow) shown in the ArrayExpress Archive.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Development of an Ontology for Periodontitis.
    Suzuki A, Takai-Igarashi T, Nakaya J, Tanaka H. Suzuki A, et al. J Biomed Semantics. 2015 Jul 1;6:30. doi: 10.1186/s13326-015-0028-y. eCollection 2015. J Biomed Semantics. 2015. PMID: 26140188 Free PMC article.
  • Deep multiview learning to identify imaging-driven subtypes in mild cognitive impairment.
    Feng Y, Kim M, Yao X, Liu K, Long Q, Shen L; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Feng Y, et al. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Sep 29;23(Suppl 3):402. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04946-x. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022. PMID: 36175853 Free PMC article.
  • Ontology application and use at the ENCODE DCC.
    Malladi VS, Erickson DT, Podduturi NR, Rowe LD, Chan ET, Davidson JM, Hitz BC, Ho M, Lee BT, Miyasato S, Roe GR, Simison M, Sloan CA, Strattan JS, Tanaka F, Kent WJ, Cherry JM, Hong EL. Malladi VS, et al. Database (Oxford). 2015 Mar 16;2015:bav010. doi: 10.1093/database/bav010. Print 2015. Database (Oxford). 2015. PMID: 25776021 Free PMC article. Review.
  • A large-scale crop protection bioassay data set.
    Gaulton A, Kale N, van Westen GJ, Bellis LJ, Bento AP, Davies M, Hersey A, Papadatos G, Forster M, Wege P, Overington JP. Gaulton A, et al. Sci Data. 2015 Jul 7;2:150032. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.32. eCollection 2015. Sci Data. 2015. PMID: 26175909 Free PMC article.
  • A semantic proteomics dashboard (SemPoD) for data management in translational research.
    Jayapandian CP, Zhao M, Ewing RM, Zhang GQ, Sahoo SS. Jayapandian CP, et al. BMC Syst Biol. 2012;6 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S20. doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-S3-S20. Epub 2012 Dec 17. BMC Syst Biol. 2012. PMID: 23282161 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Blake JA, Harris MA. The Gene Ontology (GO) project: structured vocabularies for molecular biology and their application to genome and expression analysis. Curr. Protoc. Bioinformatics. 2008 Chapter 7, Unit 7.2. - PubMed
    1. Bizer C, et al. Linked data - the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 2009;5:1–22.
    1. Grenon P, Smith B. SNAP and SPAN: towards dynamic spatial ontology. Spat. Cogn. Comput.Interdiscip. J. 2004;4:69–104.
    1. Gómez-Pérez A, et al. Ontological engineering. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2004.
    1. Horridge M. The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies. Proceedings of the OWL: Experiences and Directions 2009, Chantilly, USA, CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2009

Publication types

MeSH terms