Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul 7;277(1690):2035-40.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2335. Epub 2010 Mar 3.

Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry

Affiliations

Reproductive competition promotes the evolution of female weaponry

Nicola L Watson et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Secondary sexual traits in females are a relatively rare phenomenon. Empirical studies have focused on the role of male mate choice in their evolution; however, recently it has been suggested that secondary sexual traits in females are more likely to be under selection via reproductive competition. We investigated female competition and the influence of female phenotype on fitness in Onthophagus sagittarius, a species of dung beetle that exhibits female-specific horns. We compared reproductive fitness when females were breeding in competition versus breeding alone and found that competition for breeding resources reduced fitness for all females, but that smaller individuals suffered a greater fitness reduction than larger individuals. When females were matched for body size, those with the longest horns gained higher reproductive fitness. The fitness function was positive and linear, favouring increased horn expression. Thus, we present evidence that female body size and horn size in O. sagittarius are under directional selection via competition for reproductive resources. Our study is a rare example of female contest competition selecting for female weaponry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relationship between female body size (pronotum width) and horn size (head horn length). Symbol size represents from 1 to 3 overlapping data points (R2 = 0.87, p < 0.0001).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Focal female fitness (average number of brood balls produced ± 1 s.e.) when breeding alone (black bars) and in competition (white bars) for all female size categories.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationship between relative horn length and relative fitness of competing O. sagittarius females. Positive values on the x- and y-axes represent cases where, between two competing females that had been matched for body size, the focal female had a larger horn and produced more broods relative to her competitor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Amundsen T.2000Female ornaments: genetically correlated or sexually selected? In Animal signals: signalling and signal design in animal communication (eds Espmark Y., Amundsen T., Rosenqvist G.), pp. 133–154 Trondheim, Norway: Tapir Academic Press
    1. Amundsen T., Forsgren E.2001Male mate choice selects for female coloration in a fish. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 13 155–13 160 (doi:10.1073/pnas.211439298) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andersson M.1994Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
    1. Berglund A., Magnhagen C., Bisazza A., Konig B., Huntingford F.1993The adaptive bases of female sexual behavior: reports from a workshop. Behav. Ecol. 4, 184–187 (doi:10.1093/beheco/4.2.184) - DOI
    1. Berglund A., Bisazza A., Pilastro A.1996Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 385–399 (doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1996.tb01442.x) - DOI

Publication types