Influence of metabolic syndrome on risk stratification in hypertensive patients: differences between 2003 and 2007 ESH-ESC guidelines
- PMID: 20200202
- DOI: 10.1177/1753944709341304
Influence of metabolic syndrome on risk stratification in hypertensive patients: differences between 2003 and 2007 ESH-ESC guidelines
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the influence of metabolic syndrome (MS) on risk stratification and ulterior classification in hypertensive patients at entry into a hypertension unit by comparing the criteria of ESH-ESC 2003 and 2007 guidelines.
Methods: 720 consecutive patients attending a hospital-located hypertension unit were included in the study. They were classified with or without MS according to the ATP-III 2005 report. Patients underwent repeated office BP measurements and routine blood/urine examinations. In addition ultrasensitive CRP (uCRP), echocardiogram, fasting insulin, urinary albumin excretion were determined and HOMA index was calculated.
Results: The prevalence of MS was 58.8 %. Abdominal obesity and fasting glucose were the most prevalent components of MS, and HDL-cholesterol the least prevalent. MS group had higher levels of LDL-cholesterol and higher prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy and microalbuminuria. Patients with MS also presented a significant elevation in uCRP, fasting insulin and HOMA. BP was controlled in 55.6%. When we applied the 2003 guideline, 48.9% patients showed a high or very high added cardiovascular risk. With the applications of the 2007 guide the prevalence of this two categories reach 73.9%.
Conclusions: A significant difference in the risk pattern distribution is found when MS is considered in risk stratification in our hypertensive population. The accompanying increase in the levels of other cardiovascular risk factors and in the prevalence of target organ damage justifies the global intervention on cardiovascular risk recommended by 2007 ESH-ESC guidelines.
Similar articles
-
Cardiovascular risk stratification according to the 2003 ESH-ESC guidelines in uncomplicated patients with essential hypertension: comparison with the 1999 WHO/ISH guidelines criteria.Blood Press. 2004;13(3):144-51. doi: 10.1080/08037050410033169. Blood Press. 2004. PMID: 15223722
-
Impact of different definitions of the metabolic syndrome on the prevalence of organ damage, cardiometabolic risk and cardiovascular events.J Hypertens. 2010 May;28(5):999-1006. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e328337a9e3. J Hypertens. 2010. PMID: 20308922
-
Glucose metabolism in patients with essential hypertension.Am J Med. 2006 Apr;119(4):318-26. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.09.010. Am J Med. 2006. PMID: 16564774
-
Metabolic syndrome in subjects with essential hypertension: relationships with subclinical cardiovascular and renal damage.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2006 Apr;54(2):173-94. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2006. PMID: 16778751 Review.
-
Metabolic syndrome and right ventricle: an updated review.Eur J Intern Med. 2013 Oct;24(7):608-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Aug 31. Eur J Intern Med. 2013. PMID: 24001437 Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical attributes, treatment, and control in hypertension (CATCH)-a French and Italian longitudinal patient database study.Clin Hypertens. 2015 Aug 10;21:18. doi: 10.1186/s40885-015-0029-2. eCollection 2015. Clin Hypertens. 2015. PMID: 26893928 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous