Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2010 Jun;17(6):811-4.
doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.22. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Cutaneous vaccination using microneedles coated with hepatitis C DNA vaccine

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Cutaneous vaccination using microneedles coated with hepatitis C DNA vaccine

H S Gill et al. Gene Ther. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

The skin is potentially an excellent organ for vaccine delivery because of accessibility and the presence of immune cells. However, no simple and inexpensive cutaneous vaccination method is available. Micron-scale needles coated with DNA were tested as a simple, inexpensive device for skin delivery. Vaccination with a plasmid encoding hepatitis C virus nonstructural 3/4A protein using microneedles effectively primed specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs). Importantly, the minimally invasive microneedles were as efficient in priming CTLs as more complicated or invasive delivery techniques, such as gene gun and hypodermic needles. Thus, microneedles may offer a promising technology for DNA vaccination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Coated microneedles
Microneedles were cut from stainless steel sheets using an infrared laser and electropolished as described before . (A) Photograph of a representative microneedle row held in a human hand. (B) Microneedle row with five microneedles uniformly coated with vitamin B2 as a model compound. Because plasmid coatings were difficult to visualize, uniformity of coatings was assessed by coating microneedles with a model colored compound, vitamin B2 (riboflavin-5'-phosphate sodium salt dihydrate) (Fisher Scientific, Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). The aqueous dip-coating solution contained 1% (w/v) carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt (CMC, low viscosity, USP grade, CarboMer, San Diego, CA, USA), 0.5% (w/v) Lutrol F-68 NF (BASF, Mt. Olive, NJ, USA) and 20 mg/ml vitamin B2 . Microneedles were coated using a custom dip-coating device and air-dried for >24h . For immunization, microneedles were coated using the same formulation, but by replacing vitamin B2 with 5 mg/ml codon optimized NS3/4A plasmid DNA. To determine the amount of DNA coated on microneedles, DNA concentration was measured by a validated technique using UV absorbance at 260 nm in a solution prepared by vortexing coated microneedles for 1 min in 1ml deionized water. (C) Histological section of porcine cadaver skin after inserting sulforhodamine-coated microneedle. To histologically characterize insertion of microneedles into skin, microneedles were coated with 0.1% (w/v) sulforhodamine (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) and inserted into porcine cadaver skin for 1 min.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Microneedle-based immunization induces antigen-specific CTLs
Groups of 4-8 week old female C57BL/6 or Balb/c mice (Charles River, Uppsala, Sweden) were immunized cutaneously with microneedles or gene gun, or intramusculary using hypodermic needles.For microneedle-based immunization two or five rows per mouse were used to control the dose. Each microneedle row was coated with 1.6 μg DNA. DNA-coated microneedle rows were manually inserted into trimmed abdominal or back skin and held for 1 min to allow dissolution of coated DNA into skin. For gene gun-based immunization mice were immunized by gene gun (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) at a dose of 4 μg/mouse as previously described . Plasmid DNA was linked to 1-μm diameter gold particles for gene gun-based immunizations according to protocols supplied by the manufacturer. For intramuscular immunization mice were injected with 100 μg DNA in the tibialis anterior using a hypodermic needle. Un-treated (naive) mice were used as a negative control. All experimental protocols were approved by the ethical committee for animal research at Karolinska Institutet. (A) C57B1/6 mice immunized once with codon-optimized NS3/4A DNA using either microneedles (1.6 μg per row × 5 microneedle rows per mouse = 8 μg dose; n=4 mice; gray bars), gene gun (4 μg dose; n=4 mice; black bars) or no immunization (n=2 mice; white bars) and euthanized after two weeks. As described previously ,, cells harvested from the spleen (effector cells, 2.5×107 cells per mouse) were restimulated with a NS3 H-2Db-specific peptide and 2.5×107 irradiated naïve C57B1/6 spleenocytes cells. After five days, 5×103 RMA-S cells pulsed with NS3 H-2Db-specific peptide and labeled with 51Cr were used as target cells. The specific cell lysis of target cells was then measured at different effector-to-target cell ratios by measuring 51Cr released from lysed target cells. (B) Balb/C mice were either immunized intramuscularly (100 μg; n=5 mice),cutaneously with microneedles (1.6 μg per row × 2 microneedle rows per mouse = 3.2 μg dose; n=5 mice) or were not immunized (n=2 mice). Presence of in vivo functional CTLs was determined using a tumor challenge model . Two weeks after immunization, mice were subcutaneously injected with 1×106 SP2/0 myeloma cells stably transfected with NS3/4A. Tumor growth was then monitored daily through skin by recording mean tumor size (thickness of skin flap at tumor injection site) for 14 days and compared to growth of the same tumor cell line in non-vaccinated mice. Mean tumor sizes were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA, α=0.05). Error bars represent SD; Symbol ‡ represents p<0.05; NS means not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garmory HS, Perkins SD, Phillpotts RJ, Titball RW. DNA vaccines for biodefence. Adv Drug Deliver Rev. 2005;57:1343–1361. - PubMed
    1. Donnelly J, Berry K, Ulmer JB. Technical and regulatory hurdles for DNA vaccines. Int J Parasitol. 2003;33:457–467. - PubMed
    1. Nicolas JF, Guy B. Intradermal, epidermal and transcutaneous vaccination: from immunology to clinical practice. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7:1201–1214. - PubMed
    1. Prausnitz MR, Mikszta JA, Cormier M, Andrianov AK. Microneedle-based vaccines. In: Compans RW, Orenstein WA, editors. Current Topics in Microbiology & Immunology: Vaccines for Pandemic Influenza. Springer-Verlag; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2009.
    1. Matriano JA, Cormier M, Johnson J, Young WA, Buttery M, Nyam K, et al. Macroflux microprojection array patch technology: a new and efficient approach for intracutaneous immunization. Pharm Res. 2002;19:63–70. - PubMed

Publication types