Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jun;25(6):1406-14.
doi: 10.1002/jbmr.33.

Mechanical implications of estrogen supplementation in early postmenopausal women

Affiliations

Mechanical implications of estrogen supplementation in early postmenopausal women

Felix W Wehrli et al. J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jun.

Abstract

Whereas the structural implications of drug intervention are well established, there are few data on the possible mechanical consequences of treatment. In this work we examined the changes in elastic and shear moduli (EM and SM) in a region of trabecular bone in the distal radius and distal tibia of early postmenopausal women on the basis of MRI-based micro-finite-element (microFE) analysis. Whole-section axial stiffness (AS) encompassing both trabecular and cortical compartments was evaluated as well. The study was conducted on previously acquired high-resolution images at the two anatomic sites. Images were processed to yield a 3D voxel array of bone-volume fraction (BVF), which was converted to a microFE model of hexahedral elements in which tissue modulus was set proportional to voxel BVF. The study comprised 65 early postmenopausal women (age range 45 to 55 years), of whom 32 had chosen estrogen supplementation (estradiol group); the remainder had not (control group). Subjects had been scanned at baseline and 12 and 24 months thereafter. At the distal tibia, EM and SM were reduced by 2.9% to 5.5% in the control group (p < .05 to <.005), but there was no change in the estradiol subjects. AS decreased 3.9% (4.0%) in controls (p < .005) and increased by 5.8% (6.2%) in estradiol group subjects (p < .05) at 12 (24) months. At the distal radius, EM and SM changes from baseline were not significant, but at both time points AS was increased in estradiol group subjects and decreased in controls (p < .005 to <.05), albeit by a smaller margin than at the tibia. EM and SM were strongly correlated with BV/TV (r(2) = 0.44 to 0.92) as well as with topologic parameters expressing the ratio of plates to rods (r(2) = 0.45 to 0.82), jointly explaining up to 96% of the variation in the mechanical parameters. Finally, baseline AS was strongly correlated between the two anatomic sites (r(2) = 0.58), suggesting that intersubject variations in the bone's mechanical competence follows similar mechanisms. In conclusion, the results demonstrate that micro-MRI-based microFE models are suited for the study of the mechanical implications of antiresorptive treatment. The data further highlight the anabolic effect of short-term estrogen supplementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Image acquisition and processing flow to compute full cross-sectional axial stiffness and subregional mechanical and topologic parameters of trabecular bone from µMRI images of distal radius and distal tibia.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Within-group mean temporal changes (%) in subregional mechanical parameters and BV/TV of distal tibia from baseline to 12 and 24 months. The p values indicate the significance of the computed changes. Between-group changes from baseline were not significant.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Within-group mean temporal changes (%) in full cross-sectional axial stiffness of (A) distal tibia and (B) distal radius from baseline to the two follow-up time points. Error bars represent standard error of mean changes. Intergroup differences in the temporal changes were significant at both follow-up time points and for both anatomic sites (p < .005). For details, see text.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Comparison of full cross-sectional stiffness (MPa) of distal tibia and distal radius computed from µMR-based µFE analysis at baseline.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality–the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2250–61. - PubMed
    1. Paschalis EP, Boskey AL, Kassem M, Eriksen EF. Effect of hormone replacement therapy on bone quality in early postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18:955–9. - PubMed
    1. Recker RR, Barger-Lux MJ. The elusive concept of bone quality. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2004;2:97–100. - PubMed
    1. Sarkar S, Mitlak BH, Wong M, Stock JL, Black DM, Harper KD. Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17:1–10. - PubMed
    1. Genant HK, Jiang Y. Advanced imaging assessment of bone quality. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1068:410–28. - PubMed

Publication types