Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb:1187:101-21.
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05141.x.

Amphetamine toxicities: classical and emerging mechanisms

Affiliations
Review

Amphetamine toxicities: classical and emerging mechanisms

Bryan K Yamamoto et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

The drugs of abuse, methamphetamine and MDMA, produce long-term decreases in markers of biogenic amine neurotransmission. These decreases have been traditionally linked to nerve terminals and are evident in a variety of species, including rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans. Recent studies indicate that the damage produced by these drugs may be more widespread than originally believed. Changes indicative of damage to cell bodies of biogenic and nonbiogenic amine-containing neurons in several brain areas and endothelial cells that make up the blood-brain barrier have been reported. The processes that mediate this damage involve not only oxidative stress but also include excitotoxic mechanisms, neuroinflammation, the ubiquitin proteasome system, as well as mitochondrial and neurotrophic factor dysfunction. These mechanisms also underlie the toxicity associated with chronic stress and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, both of which have been shown to augment the toxicity to methamphetamine. Overall, multiple mechanisms are involved and interact to promote neurotoxicity to methamphetamine and MDMA. Moreover, the high coincidence of substituted amphetamine abuse by humans with HIV and/or chronic stress exposure suggests a potential enhanced vulnerability of these individuals to the neurotoxic actions of the amphetamines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NIDA. NIDA Notes. NIDA’s Latest Research Report Focuses on MDMA (Ecstasy) Abuse. 2005;19 http://www.drugabuse.gov/NIDA.notes/NNvol19N5/tearoff.html.
    1. NIDA. NIDA InfoFacts. Methamphetamine and MDMA (Esctasy) 2008 http://www.nida.nih.gov/DrugPages.
    1. NIDA. NIDA Community Drug Alert Bulletin–Methamphetamine. 2008 http://www.drugabuse.gov/MethAlert/MethAlert.
    1. Mitchell SJ, et al. Methamphetamine use and sexual activity among HIV-infected patients in care–San Francisco, 2004. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2006;20:502–510. - PubMed
    1. Kuczenski R, et al. Hippocampus norepinephrine, caudate dopamine and serotonin, and behavioral responses to the stereoisomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine. J Neurosci. 1995;15:1308–1317. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms