Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice
- PMID: 20202351
- PMCID: PMC2828863
- DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X483508
Patient satisfaction with point-of-care testing in general practice
Abstract
Background: Point-of-care testing is increasingly being used in general practice to assist GPs in their management of patients with chronic disease. However, patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in general practice has not been widely studied.
Aim: To determine if patients are more satisfied with point-of-care testing than with pathology laboratory testing for three chronic conditions.
Design of study: As part of a large multicentre, randomised, controlled trial assessing the use of point-of-care testing in Australian general practice, satisfaction was measured for patients having pathology testing performed by point-of-care testing devices or pathology laboratories. Patients in the trial were managed by GPs for diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, and/or anticoagulant therapy.
Method: Patient satisfaction was measured using level of agreement with a variety of statements at the end of the study with a patient satisfaction questionnaire for both the intervention and control groups. Analysis was performed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) with allowance for clustering at the practice level following Box-Cox transformations of the data to achieve normality.
Results: Overall, intervention patients reported that they were satisfied with point-of-care testing. In comparison with the control group, the intervention group had a higher level of agreement than control patients with statements relating to their satisfaction with the collection process (P<0.001) and confidence in the process (P<0.001). They also viewed point-of-care testing as strengthening their relationship with their GP (P = 0.010) and motivational in terms of better managing their condition (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results from this trial support patient satisfaction and acceptability of point-of-care testing in a general practice setting.
Figures
Comment in
-
Near-patient testing in primary care.Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Mar;60(572):157-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483454. Br J Gen Pract. 2010. PMID: 20202359 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of a training program for device operators in the Australian Government's Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial: issues and implications for rural and remote practices.Rural Remote Health. 2009 Jul-Sep;9(3):1189. Epub 2009 Aug 10. Rural Remote Health. 2009. PMID: 19689171 Clinical Trial.
-
Does point-of-care testing lead to the same or better adherence to medication? A randomised controlled trial: the PoCT in General Practice Trial.Med J Aust. 2009 Nov 2;191(9):487-91. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02910.x. Med J Aust. 2009. PMID: 19883342 Clinical Trial.
-
A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting - rationale, design and baseline characteristics.Trials. 2008 Aug 6;9:50. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-50. Trials. 2008. PMID: 18681979 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing agreement between point of care and pathology laboratory results for INR: experiences from the Point of Care Testing in General Practice Trial.Pathology. 2010 Feb;42(2):155-9. doi: 10.3109/00313020903494045. Pathology. 2010. PMID: 20085517
-
A patient determined general practice satisfaction questionnaire.Aust Fam Physician. 1999 Apr;28(4):342-8. Aust Fam Physician. 1999. PMID: 10330758
Cited by
-
Health Economic Evidence of Point-of-Care Testing: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Jun;5(2):157-173. doi: 10.1007/s41669-020-00248-1. Epub 2021 Jan 6. Pharmacoecon Open. 2021. PMID: 33405188 Free PMC article.
-
Early experiences with quality-assured HbA1c and professional glucose point-of-care testing in general practice: a cross-sectional observational study among patients, nurses and doctors.BMC Nurs. 2022 Jul 8;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00969-0. BMC Nurs. 2022. PMID: 35804341 Free PMC article.
-
"It Was Very Comforting to Find Out Right Away." - Patient Perspectives on Point-of-Care Molecular SARS-CoV-2 Testing in Primary Care.Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022 Aug 10;16:2031-2039. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S372366. eCollection 2022. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022. PMID: 35975172 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of Albumin-to-Creatinine Ratio Point-of-Care Testing on the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Kidney Disease.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):428-438. doi: 10.1177/19322968211054520. Epub 2021 Oct 28. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 34709065 Free PMC article.
-
The Impact of Point-of-Care Hemoglobin A1c Testing on Population Health-Based Onsite Testing Adherence: A Primary-Care Quality Improvement Study.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021 May;15(3):561-567. doi: 10.1177/1932296820972751. Epub 2020 Nov 24. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2021. PMID: 33233954 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Price C, St John A. Point-of-care testing. 2nd edn. Washington DC: AACC Press; 2004.
-
- Laurence C, Gialamas A, Yelland L, et al. A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting — rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Trials. 2008;9:50. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bubner T, Laurence C, Gialamas A, et al. Effectiveness of point-of-care testing for therapeutic control of chronic conditions: results from the PoCT in General Practice Trial. Med J Aust. 2009;190(11):624–626. - PubMed
-
- Cohen J, Piterman L, McCall L, Segal L. Near-patient testing for serum cholesterol: attitudes of general practitioners and patients, appropriateness, and costs. Med J Aust. 1998;168(12):605–609. - PubMed
-
- Gillam S, Freedman D, Naughton B, et al. An evaluation of near patient testing in general practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 1998;4(2):165–169. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials