Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2010 Mar;60(572):e113-20.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp10X483535.

Factors associated with immunisation coverage and timeliness in New Zealand

Cameron C Grant  1 , Nikki M Turner, Deon G York, Felicity Goodyear-Smith, Helen A Petousis-Harris
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Factors associated with immunisation coverage and timeliness in New Zealand

Cameron C Grant et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Immunisation coverage in New Zealand is lower than what is necessary to prevent large epidemics of pertussis. Primary care is where most immunisation delivery occurs. General practices vary in their structure and organisation, both in a general sense and specifically with respect to immunisation delivery.

Aim: To identify the structural and organisational characteristics of general practices associated with higher immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery.

Design of study: A random sample of practices during 2005 and 2006.

Setting: General practices in the Auckland and Midland regions, with over-sampling of indigenous Maori governance practices.

Method: Practice immunisation coverage and timeliness were measured. Primary care practice characteristics relevant to immunisation delivery by the practice were described. Associations of these practice characteristics with higher practice immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery were determined.

Results: A total of 124 (61%) of 205 eligible practices were recruited. A median (25th to 75th centile) of 71% (57-77%) of registered children at each practice were fully immunised, and 56% (40-64%) had no immunisation delay. In multivariate analyses, both practice immunisation coverage (P<0.001) and timeliness (P<0.001) decreased with increased social deprivation. After adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation, region, and governance, immunisation coverage and timeliness were better at practices that enrolled children at a younger age (coverage: P = 0.002; timeliness P = 0.007), used one of the four available practice management systems (coverage: P<0.001; timeliness: P = 0.006), and had no staff shortages (coverage: P = 0.027; timeliness: P = 0.021).

Conclusion: Practice immunisation coverage and timeliness vary widely in New Zealand. General organisational and structural aspects of general practices are key determinants of general practice immunisation delivery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Summary of practice recruitment and enrolment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Immunisation coverage and timeliness by practice.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Plotkin SA, Orenstein WA. Vaccines. 4th edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc; 2004.
    1. Ministry of Health. Immunisation handbook 2006. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2006.
    1. Somerville RL, Grant CC, Grimwood K, et al. Infants hospitalised with pertussis: estimating the true disease burden. J Paediatr Child Health. 2007;43(9):617–622. - PubMed
    1. Elliott E, McIntyre P, Ridley G, et al. National study of infants hospitalised with pertussis in the acellular vaccine era. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(3):246–252. - PubMed
    1. Van Buynder PG, Owen D, Vurdien JE, et al. Bordetella pertussis surveillance in England and Wales: 1995–7. Epidemiol Infect. 1999;123(3):403–411. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms