Risk stratification and early oncologic outcomes following robotic prostatectomy
- PMID: 20202392
- PMCID: PMC3030785
- DOI: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404164
Risk stratification and early oncologic outcomes following robotic prostatectomy
Abstract
Background and objectives: Although the popularity of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is assured, little is known about the oncologic outcomes following the procedure.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study including consecutive patients who underwent the surgery between 2003 and 2007 with at least 6 months of follow-up (n=464). Patients were stratified into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups according to D'Amico criteria. Biochemical failure was defined as a PSA > or =0.2 ng/mL.
Results: Of study patients, 256 (55%), 171 (37%), and 37 (8%) were classified as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk, respectively. Over a mean follow-up of 14.1 months (range, 6.0 to 55.3), 7.3% experienced biochemical failure. Biochemical disease-free survival at 30 months was 94%, 79%, and 73% among patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively, (P<0.001). Preoperative risk stratification was strongly associated with biochemical failure, with hazard ratios of 5.04 (95%: 1.52 to 16.7; P<0.001) and 7.04 (95%: 1.39 to 35.6; P < 0.001) for intermediate- and high- over low-risk groups, respectively. The ability of risk stratification to predict biochemical failure had an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of 0.74.
Conclusion: Robotic prostatectomy provides excellent cancer control outcomes for clinically localized disease.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Oncologic outcomes at 10 years following robotic radical prostatectomy.Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1168-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.025. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Eur Urol. 2015. PMID: 24996687
-
Biochemical recurrence-free survival after robotic-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer.Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1309-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.02.023. Epub 2014 Apr 18. Urology. 2014. PMID: 24746665
-
Reassessment of the risk factors for biochemical recurrence in D'Amico intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated using radical prostatectomy.Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1029-35. doi: 10.1111/iju.12898. Epub 2015 Aug 20. Int J Urol. 2015. PMID: 26290306
-
Intermediate-term cancer control outcomes in prostate cancer patients treated with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a multi-institutional analysis.World J Urol. 2016 Oct;34(10):1357-66. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1781-y. Epub 2016 Feb 12. World J Urol. 2016. PMID: 26873596
-
Histopathologic outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy.ScientificWorldJournal. 2006 Jun 2;6:2566-72. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.397. ScientificWorldJournal. 2006. PMID: 17619732 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:71–96 - PubMed
-
- D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998;280:969–974 - PubMed
-
- Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Blute ML. Mayo Clinic validation of the D'amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:1354–1361 - PubMed
-
- Hernandez DJ, Nielsen ME, Han M, Partin AW. Contemporary evaluation of the D'amico risk classification of prostate cancer. Urology. 2007;70:931–935 - PubMed
-
- Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology. 2006;68:1275–1279 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous