Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):542-9.
doi: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404326.

Zero leaks with minimally invasive esophagectomy: a team-based approach

Affiliations

Zero leaks with minimally invasive esophagectomy: a team-based approach

Amit Khithani et al. JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery has been applied in several ways to esophagectomy. Newer techniques have improved patient outcomes while maintaining oncological principles; however, mortality still exists. Most series have reported mortality rates ranging from 2% to 25%. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIE) in a non-university tertiary care center.

Methods: MIE in the form of a combined thoracoscopic and laparoscopic technique was performed cooperatively by 2 surgeons. Records of patients who underwent MIE between September 2005 and August 2008 were retrospectively reviewed.

Results: Thirty-four patients underwent MIE over a 3-year period. There was a male predominance. Mean age at presentation was 62.6 years. Comorbidities were documented in 79% of the patients. Most patients (68%) presented with dysphagia. Two patients had end-stage achalasia, 1 had corrosive esophageal stricture, and 31 had esophageal malignancies. No mortalities were reported. No anastomotic leaks were observed. Eighteen (58%) patients with malignancy received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Six (33%) patients had a pathological response (CR) on final histopathology. The mean operating time was 294 minutes. The mean blood loss was 302 mL.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive esophagectomy can be performed with results that meet and exceed reported benchmarks. A team-based approach greatly impacts the outcome of the surgery. This surgical technique must be standardized to achieve this outcome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Port placement for thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Port placement for laparoscopic component.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan MA, Lewis WG, Hopper AN, et al. Prospective comparison of transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy following neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(3):225–231 - PubMed
    1. Boyle MJ, Franceschi D, Livingstone AS. Transhiatal versus transthoracic esophagectomy: complication and survival rates. Am Surg. 1999;65(12):1137–1141 - PubMed
    1. Bizekis C, Kent MS, Luketich JD, et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;82(2):402–406 - PubMed
    1. Qureshi I, Nason KS, Luketich JD. Is minimally invasive esophagectomy indicated for cancer? Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008;8(9):1449–1460 - PubMed
    1. Mark B. Orringer, Becky Marshall, Mark D. Iannettoni, Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:277–288 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources