Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct-Dec;13(4):555-9.
doi: 10.4293/108680809X12589998404407.

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal polyps

Refael Itah  1 , Ron Greenberg, Smadar Nir, Eliad Karin, Yehuda Skornick, Shmuel Avital
Affiliations

Laparoscopic surgery for colorectal polyps

Refael Itah et al. JSLS. 2009 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Background: Size, location, and type of colonic polyps may prevent colonoscopic polypectomy. Laparoscopic colectomy may serve as an optimal alternative in these patients. We assessed the perioperative outcome and the risk for cancer in patients operated on laparoscopically for colonic polyps not amenable to colonoscopic resection.

Methods: An evaluation was conducted of our prospective accumulated data of a consecutive series of patients operated on for colonic polyps.

Results: Sixty-four patients underwent laparoscopic resection for colonic polyps during a 6-year period. This group comprised 18% of all our laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Forty-six percent were males, mean age was 71. Most of the polyps (66%) were located on the right side. No deaths occurred. Conversion was necessary in 3 patients (4.6%). Significant complications occurred in 3 patients (4.6%). Nine patients (14%) were found to have malignancy. Three of them had lymph-node involvement. No difference existed in polyp size between malignant and nonmalignant lesions.

Conclusions: Laparoscopic colectomy for endoscopic nonresectable colonic polyps is a safe, simple procedure as reflected by the low rate of conversions and complications. However, invasive cancer may be found in the final pathology following surgery. This mandates a strict adherence to surgical oncological principles. Polyp size cannot predict the risk of malignancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Waye JD. How big is too big? Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43(3):256–257 - PubMed
    1. Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB. Endoscopic resection of large sessile colonic polyps by specialist and nonspecialist endoscopists. Br J Surg. 2002;89(8):1020–1024 - PubMed
    1. Church JM. Experience in the endoscopic management of large colonic polyps. ANZ J Surg. 2003;73(12):988–995 - PubMed
    1. Berends FJ, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Lange JF. Subcutaneous metastases after laparoscopic colectomy. Lancet. 1994;344(8914):58. - PubMed
    1. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al. ; for The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg. 246(4):655–662, 2007; discussion 662–664 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources