Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
- PMID: 20202400
- PMCID: PMC3030794
- DOI: 10.4293/108680809X1258998404524
Clinical outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy
Abstract
Background: Appendectomy, being the most common surgical procedure performed in general surgery, is still being performed by both open and laparoscopic methods due to a lack of consensus as to which is the most appropriate method. Because further trials are necessary and few such studies have been performed in developing countries, we decided to evaluate the outcomes of the 2 procedures to share our experience with the international community.
Methods: Consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis who underwent laparoscopic (LA) (n=48) and open (n=52) appendectomy (OA) over a period of 3 years were studied. Clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups in relation to operative time, analgesia used, length of hospital stay, return to work, resumption of a regular diet, and postoperative complications.
Results: Mean age of patients was 25.8 years in the laparoscopic and 25.5 years in the open group. Patient demographics were similar in both groups (P>0.05). There was significantly less need for analgesia (1.0+/-0.5 in LA and 1.5+/-0.6 doses in OA), a short hospital stay (1.4+/-0.7 in LA and 3.4+/-1.0 days in OA), early return to work (12.6+/-3.3 in LA and 19.1+/-3.1 days in OA), and less time needed to return to a regular diet (20.1+/-2.9 in LA and 22.0+/-4.7, P<0.05 in OA) in the laparoscopic appendectomy group. Operative time was significantly shorter (54.9+/-14.7 in LA and 13.6+/-12.6 minutes in OA) in the open group. Total number of complications was less in the laparoscopic group; however, there was no statistically significant difference.
Conclusion: The laparoscopic technique is a safe and clinically beneficial operative procedure. It provides certain advantages over open appendectomy, including short hospital stay, decreased requirement of postoperative analgesia, early food tolerance, and earlier return to normal activities. Where feasible, laparoscopy should be undertaken as the initial procedure of choice for most cases of suspected appendicitis.
Similar articles
-
Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience.J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;44(10):1924-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.03.037. J Pediatr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19853748
-
Laparoscopic vs open appendectomy. Prospective randomized study of outcomes.Arch Surg. 1997 Jul;132(7):708-11; discussion 712. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430310022003. Arch Surg. 1997. PMID: 9230853 Clinical Trial.
-
A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for the treatment of complicated appendicitis: historical cohort study.Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Aug;46(4):847-851. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01086-5. Epub 2019 Feb 2. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020. PMID: 30710176 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy--a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC Gastroenterol. 2010 Nov 3;10:129. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-10-129. BMC Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 21047410 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):969-73. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8262-2. Epub 2004 Apr 21. Surg Endosc. 2004. PMID: 15095081 Review.
Cited by
-
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for appendicitis in elderly patients.J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011 Oct;27(5):241-5. doi: 10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.241. Epub 2011 Oct 31. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011. PMID: 22102974 Free PMC article.
-
A new right groin incision versus McBurney's incision for open appendectomy: a randomized controlled trial.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Nov;403(7):805-810. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1719-5. Epub 2018 Oct 20. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018. PMID: 30343415 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of outcomes of open and laparoscopic appendectomy: A retrospective cohort study.Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;6(8):e1483. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1483. eCollection 2023 Aug. Health Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37547357 Free PMC article.
-
A Case Report of Perforated Appendix Vermiform Attached to the Left Ovary.Cureus. 2023 Dec 29;15(12):e51270. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51270. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38283434 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Surgical Site Infections in Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study.Cureus. 2025 Mar 13;17(3):e80530. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80530. eCollection 2025 Mar. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40225502 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group. A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Am J Surg. 1995;169:208–13 - PubMed
-
- Hellberg A, Rudberg C, Kullman E, et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:48–53 - PubMed
-
- Heikkinen TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost-effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1204–8 - PubMed
-
- Tate JJ, Chung SC, Dawson J, et al. Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1993;80:761–764 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical