Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Feb 1;33(1):49-64.
doi: 10.1353/etc.0.0086.

Analysis of Mand Selection across Different Stimulus Conditions

Affiliations

Analysis of Mand Selection across Different Stimulus Conditions

Lisa Winborn-Kemmerer et al. Educ Treat Children. .

Abstract

We conducted a three-phase study to evaluate the use of mands and the occurrence of problem behavior for 2 children with developmental disabilities. During Phase 1, a functional analysis identified the variables maintaining problem behavior. During Phase 2, functional communication training was implemented within a concurrent schedules design. The children were reinforced for using either a novel mand (communication card) or other existing mands (vocal speech, manual signs) that were not specifically trained but were observed to be part of the children's existing repertoire. We then conducted an assessment of mands and problem behavior across different stimulus conditions (card absent, card present) within an ABAB design (Phase 3). Results showed that during Phase 2, problem behavior decreased and participants used the card more frequently than they used other existing mands. Phase 3 showed that problem behavior remained low across both stimulus conditions. When the card was absent, the children used other existing mands; when the card was present, they primarily used the card. These results suggested that the presence of a communication card may function as a discriminative stimulus for a specific topography of manding, but that training with the card did not inhibit the use of other mands when the card was absent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of intervals of problem behavior and mands during the functional analysis for Evan (top, left panel) and Annie (bottom left panel) and functional communication training for Evan (top, right panel) and Annie (bottom, right panel).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percentage of intervals of problem behavior and mands during the mand analysis for Evan (top panel) and Annie (bottom, panel).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Browning RM. A same-subject design for simultaneous comparison of three reinforcement contingencies. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1967;5:237–243. - PubMed
    1. Carr EG, Durand VM. Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1985;18:111–126. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Charlop-Christy MH, Carpenter M, Le L, LeBlanc LA, Kellet K. Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: Assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social- communicative behavior, and problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 2002;35:213–231. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Derby KM, Fisher WW, Piazza CC, Wilke AE, Johnson W. The effects of noncontingent and contingent attention for self-injury, manding, and collateral responses. Behavior Modification. 1997;22:474–484. - PubMed
    1. Drasgow E, Halle JW, Ostrosky MM. Effects of differential reinforcement on the generalization of a replacement mand in three children with severe language delays. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis. 1998;31:357–374. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources