Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Feb;107(6):92-9.
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2010.0092. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Patient safety and error management: what causes adverse events and how can they be prevented?

Affiliations
Review

Patient safety and error management: what causes adverse events and how can they be prevented?

Barbara Hoffmann et al. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Even in industrialized countries, health care is not as safe as it should be. The term "patient safety" denotes the non-occurrence of adverse events and the presence of measures to prevent them.

Methods: The literature was selectively reviewed to obtain information on the epidemiology and causes of preventable adverse events (PAE), as well as on measures that can increase patient safety.

Results: Preventable adverse events occur in Germany both in the hospital and in outpatient settings, although their precise frequency is currently a disputed matter. PAE should be analyzed systematically. They are caused both by active errors and by latent failures that are inherent in components of the health care system.

Conclusion: Three main strategies should be pursued to improve patient safety. A safety management system involving error reporting, learning from errors, and the fair exchange of information should be established in hospitals and in doctors' outpatient practices. An error management system should be implemented in which critical incidents are identified, reported, and analyzed so that similar events can be prevented, and measures for the prevention of critical incidents and errors should also be implemented and evaluated. Finally, whenever preventable adverse events do occur, the persons involved should take action to prevent further harm to the patient and other involved individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Swiss cheese model, some gaps are due to active human failures, others to latent human failures, modified from (e5)
Figure 2
Figure 2
The learning loop consists of 5 components: monitoring patient care, identifying and reporting critical events, investigating/examining critical events, adapting processes on the basis of the lessons learned, implementing learning outcomes and repeated monitoring, re-starting the cycle all over.

Comment in

References

    1. Cooper JK, Egeberg RO, Stephens SK. Where is the malpractice crisis taking us? West J Med. 1977;127:262–266. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Med- ical Practice Study I. N Eng J Med. 1991;324:370–376. - PubMed
    1. Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Eng J Med. 1991;324:377–384. - PubMed
    1. Gawande AA, Thomas EJ, Zinner MJ, Brennan TA. The incidence and nature of surgical adverse events in Colorado and Utah in 1992. Surgery. 1999;126:66–75. - PubMed
    1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM. Committee on Quality in Health Care; Institute of Medicine. In: To err is human. Building a safer health system. Donaldson MS, editor. Washington: National Academy Press; 1999. - PubMed

MeSH terms