Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings
- PMID: 20204323
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-010-1127-z
Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: A retrospective, dual-center, cohort study on the single incision MiniArc sling and the transobturator Monarc sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence is presented. We hypothesized that both systems would perform equally well.
Methods: One hundred thirty-one (MiniArc n = 75, Monarc n = 56) consecutive patients were evaluated. Evaluation was performed by cough stress test (CST), daily pad use, IIQ-7, UDI-6, and a 0-5 visual analog scale for quality of life. The 1-year data are presented.
Results: Six weeks after surgery, 91% of the patients in both populations had a negative CST. At 1 year, 85% of the MiniArc group and 89% of the Monarc group (p = 0.60) maintained a negative CST. QoL, symptom scores, and number of pads improved significantly and were comparable in both groups. Complication rates were similar.
Conclusions: These results suggest that MiniArc sling and Monarc sling are equally effective in the treatment of stress incontinence at 1 year follow-up.
Comment in
-
Re: the single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc and Monarc slings.Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):218. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.013. Eur Urol. 2012. PMID: 22122871 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
