Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Jul;21(7):861-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1111-7. Epub 2010 Mar 4.

Prevalence of major levator abnormalities in symptomatic patients with an underactive pelvic floor contraction

Affiliations

Prevalence of major levator abnormalities in symptomatic patients with an underactive pelvic floor contraction

Anneke B Steensma et al. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: Major levator ani abnormalities (LAA) may lead to abnormal pelvic floor muscle contraction (pfmC) and secondarily to stress urinary incontinence (SUI), prolapse, or fecal incontinence (FI).

Methods: A retrospective observational study included 352 symptomatic patients to determine prevalence of LAA in underactive pfmC and the relationship with symptoms. On 2D/3D transperineal ultrasound, PfmC was subjectively assessed as underactive (UpfmC) or normal (NpfmC) and quantified. LAA, defined as a complete avulsion of the pubic bone, was analyzed using tomographic ultrasound imaging.

Results: LAA were found in 53.8% of women with UpfmC versus 16.1% in NpfmC (P < 0.001). Patients with UpfmC were less likely to reduce hiatal area on pfmC (mean 7% reduction vs 25% in NpfmC (P < 0.001)). An UpfmC was associated with FI (P = 0.002), not with SUI or prolapse of the anterior and central compartment.

Conclusion: An underactive pfmC is associated with increased prevalence of LAA and FI.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Antero-posterior measurements in 2D at the level of minimal hiatal dimension in rest position (left panel) and during contraction (right panel)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Antero-posterior, transverse LR and hiatal area measurements in 3D at the level of the minimal hiatal dimension in rest position (left panel) and during contraction (right panel)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) imaging of the levator hiatus with an obvious unilateral defect on the right side (TUI score 8 for the right and 0 for left)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bo K, Finckenhagen HB. Vaginal palpation of pelvic floor muscle strength: inter-test reproducibility and comparison between palpation and vaginal squeeze pressure. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:883–887. - PubMed
    1. Messelink B, Benson T, Berghmans B, Bo K, Corcos J, Fowler C, et al. Standardization of terminology of pelvic floor muscle function and dysfunction: report from the pelvic floor clinical assessment group of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2005;24:374–380. doi: 10.1002/nau.20144. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dietz HP. Levator function before and after childbirth. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;44:19–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00140.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeLancey JO, Kearney R, Chou Q, Speights S, Binno S. The appearance of levator ani muscle abnormalities in magnetic resonance images after vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101:46–53. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02465-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dietz HP, Steensma AB. The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG. 2006;113:225–230. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00819.x. - DOI - PubMed