Veterinary medicines and competition animals: the question of medication versus doping control
- PMID: 20204593
- DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-10324-7_13
Veterinary medicines and competition animals: the question of medication versus doping control
Abstract
In racing and other equine sports, it is possible to increase artificially both the physical capability and the presence of a competitive instinct, using drugs, such as anabolic steroids and agents stimulating the central nervous system. The word doping describes this illegitimate use of drugs and the primary motivation of an equine anti-doping policy is to prevent the use of these substances. However, an anti-doping policy must not impede the use of legitimate veterinary medications and most regulatory bodies in the world now distinguish the control of illicit substances (doping control) from the control of therapeutic substances (medication control). For doping drugs, the objective is to detect any trace of drug exposure (parent drug or metabolites) using the most powerful analytical methods (generally chromatographic/mass spectrometric techniques). This so-called "zero tolerance rule" is not suitable for medication control, because the high level of sensitivity of current screening methods allows the detection of totally irrelevant plasma or urine concentrations of legitimate drugs for long periods after their administration. Therefore, a new approach for these legitimate compounds, based upon pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) principles, has been developed. It involves estimating the order of magnitude of the irrelevant plasma concentration (IPC) and of the irrelevant urine concentration (IUC) in order to limit the impact of the high sensitivity of analytical techniques used for medication control. The European Horserace Scientific Liaison Committee (EHSLC), which is the European scientific committee in charge of harmonising sample testing and policies for racehorses in Europe, is responsible for estimating the IPCs and IUCs in the framework of a Risk Analysis. A Risk Analysis approach for doping/medication control involves three sequential steps, namely risk assessment, risk management, and risk communication. For medication control, the main task of EHLSC in the risk management procedure is the establishment of harmonised screening limits (HSL). The HSL is a confidential instruction to laboratories from racing authorities to screen in plasma or urine for the presence of drugs commonly used in equine medication. The HSL is derived from the IPC (for plasma) or from the IUC (for urine), established during the risk assessment step. The EHSLC decided to keep HSL confidential and to inform stakeholders of the duration of the detection time (DT) of the main medications when screening is performed with the HSL. A DT is the time at which the urinary (or plasma) concentration of a drug, in all horses involved in a trial conducted according to the EHSLC guidance rules, is shown to be lower than the HSL when controls are performed using routine screening methods. These DTs, as issued by the EHSLC (and adopted by the Fédération Equestre Internationale or FEI) provide guidance to veterinarians enabling them to determine a withdrawal time (WT) for a given horse under treatment. A WT should always be longer than a DT because the WT takes into account the impact of all sources of animal variability as well as the variability associated with the medicinal product actually administered in order to avoid a positive test. The major current scientific challenges faced in horse doping control are those instances of the administration of recombinant biological substances (EPO, GH, growth factors etc.) having putative long-lasting effects while being difficult or impossible to detect for more than a few days. Innovative bioanalytical approaches are now addressing these challenges. Using molecular tools, it is expected in the near future that transcriptional profiling analysis will be able to identify some molecular "signatures" of exposure to doping substances. The application of proteomic (i.e. the large scale investigation of protein biomarkers) and metabolomic (i.e. the study of metabolite profiling in biological samples) techniques also deserve attention for establishing possible unique fingerprints of drug abuse.
Similar articles
-
How to extrapolate a withdrawal time from an EHSLC published detection time: a Monte Carlo simulation appraisal.Equine Vet J. 2010 Apr;42(3):248-54. doi: 10.1111/j.2042-3306.2010.00028.x. Equine Vet J. 2010. PMID: 20486982
-
Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 1:S2-70. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.02.008. Epub 2008 Feb 13. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18328408 Review.
-
Some aspects of doping and medication control in equine sports.Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010;(195):369-409. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79088-4_17. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2010. PMID: 20020374 Review.
-
Challenges in detecting substances for equine anti-doping.Drug Test Anal. 2017 Sep;9(9):1291-1303. doi: 10.1002/dta.2162. Epub 2017 Apr 5. Drug Test Anal. 2017. PMID: 28087984 Review.
-
[Doping problems in horse sports--pharmacokinetics of selected antiphlogistics/analgesics relevant to doping].Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1994 Aug;101(8):331-8. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1994. PMID: 7924979 Review. German.
Cited by
-
The role of veterinarians in equestrian sport: a comparative review of ethical issues surrounding human and equine sports medicine.Vet J. 2013 Sep;197(3):535-40. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2013.05.021. Epub 2013 Jun 15. Vet J. 2013. PMID: 23773811 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Medication control of flunixin in racing horses: Possible detection times using Monte Carlo simulations.Equine Vet J. 2022 Sep;54(5):979-988. doi: 10.1111/evj.13532. Epub 2021 Nov 25. Equine Vet J. 2022. PMID: 34719043 Free PMC article.
-
Why the racing industry and equestrian disciplines need to implement population pharmacokinetics: To learn, explain, summarize, harmonize, and individualize.Drug Test Anal. 2025 Feb;17(2):250-258. doi: 10.1002/dta.3706. Epub 2024 Apr 29. Drug Test Anal. 2025. PMID: 38685692 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hormones as doping in sports.Endocrine. 2013 Apr;43(2):303-13. doi: 10.1007/s12020-012-9794-9. Epub 2012 Sep 19. Endocrine. 2013. PMID: 22990405 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials