Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Mar 5:10:46.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-46.

Spatial distribution and risk factors of Brucellosis in Iberian wild ungulates

Affiliations

Spatial distribution and risk factors of Brucellosis in Iberian wild ungulates

Pilar M Muñoz et al. BMC Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: The role of wildlife as a brucellosis reservoir for humans and domestic livestock remains to be properly established. The aim of this work was to determine the aetiology, apparent prevalence, spatial distribution and risk factors for brucellosis transmission in several Iberian wild ungulates.

Methods: A multi-species indirect immunosorbent assay (iELISA) using Brucella S-LPS antigen was developed. In several regions having brucellosis in livestock, individual serum samples were taken between 1999 and 2009 from 2,579 wild bovids, 6,448 wild cervids and4,454 Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa), and tested to assess brucellosis apparent prevalence. Strains isolated from wild boar were characterized to identify the presence of markers shared with the strains isolated from domestic pigs.

Results: Mean apparent prevalence below 0.5% was identified in chamois (Rupicapra pyrenaica), Iberian wild goat (Capra pyrenaica), and red deer (Cervus elaphus). Roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), fallow deer (Dama dama), mouflon (Ovis aries) and Barbary sheep (Ammotragus lervia) tested were seronegative. Only one red deer and one Iberian wild goat resulted positive in culture, isolating B. abortus biovar 1 and B. melitensis biovar 1, respectively. Apparent prevalence in wild boar ranged from 25% to 46% in the different regions studied, with the highest figures detected in South-Central Spain. The probability of wild boar being positive in the iELISA was also affected by age, age-by-sex interaction, sampling month, and the density of outdoor domestic pigs. A total of 104 bacterial isolates were obtained from wild boar, being all identified as B. suis biovar 2. DNA polymorphisms were similar to those found in domestic pigs.

Conclusions: In conclusion, brucellosis in wild boar is widespread in the Iberian Peninsula, thus representing an important threat for domestic pigs. By contrast, wild ruminants were not identified as a significant brucellosis reservoir for livestock.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of the typical distribution of optical density (% OD) results obtained by iELISA when testing the gold standard populations (from domestic goats) and its phylogenetically related Iberian wild goat (Capra pyrenaica) counterpart. The horizontal line represents the cut off selected for assessing the apparent prevalence of brucellosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Panel A: Apparent prevalence of brucellosis in Eurasian wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Bio-regions 1 to 5. Dots are proportional to prevalence. Only data from localities with at least 10 wild boar samples are shown. Panel B: Distribution of the different haplotypes of Brucella suis strains isolated from wild boar. Points represent an infected population cluster rather than individual isolates; the dotted line represents the south-western distribution limit of the European brown hare (Lepus europaeus). Panel C: Characteristics of the B. suis biovar 2 haplotypes isolated when identified by PCR (Mpx-PCR) and further analysis of omp2a, omp2b and omp31 genes by PCR-RFLP.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of apparent prevalence in wild boar (Sus scrofa) through age and sex classes (Panel A), and sampling period (Panel B) at the Peninsular scale.

References

    1. Cutler SJ, Whatmore AM, Commander AJ. Brucellosis, new aspects of an old disease. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;98:1270–1281. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02622.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teyssou R, Morvan J, Leleu JP, Roumegou P, Goullin B, Carteron B. About a case of Human brucellosis due to Brucella suis biovar-2. Medecine Et Maladies Infectieuses. 1989;19:160–161. doi: 10.1016/S0399-077X(89)80221-5. - DOI
    1. Godfroid J, Cloeckaert A, Liautard JP, Kohler S, Fretin D, Walravens K, Garin-Bastuji B, Letesson JJ. From the discovery of the Malta fever's agent to the discovery of a marine mammal reservoir, brucellosis has continuously been a re-emerging zoonosis. Vet Res. 2005;36:313–326. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2005003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scholz HC, Hubalek Z, Sedlacek I, Vergnaud G, Tomaso H, Al Dahouk S, Melzer F, Kampfer P, Neubauer H, Cloeckaert A, Maquart M, Zygmunt MS, Whatmore AM, Falsen E, Bahn P, Gollner C, Pfeffer M, Huber B, Busse H-J, Nockler K. Brucella microti sp. nov., isolated from the common vole Microtus arvalis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2008;58:375–382. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65356-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tryland M, Kleivane L, Alfredsson A, Kjeld M, Arnason A, Stuen S, Godfroid J. Evidence of Brucella infection in marine mammals in the North Atlantic Ocean. Vet Rec. 1999;144:588–592. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources