Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Mar 6:8:25.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-25.

Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a critical review

Tara Clinton-McHarg  1 , Mariko Carey, Rob Sanson-Fisher, Anthony Shakeshaft, Kathy Rainbird
Affiliations
Review

Measuring the psychosocial health of adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors: a critical review

Tara Clinton-McHarg et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors require psychometrically rigorous measures to assess their psychosocial well-being. Without methodologically adequate scales the accuracy of information obtained on the prevalence of needs, predictors of risk, and the potential success of any interventions, can be questioned. This review assessed the psychometric properties of measures designed specifically to identify the psychosocial health of this unique population.

Methods: Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE databases were searched to identify measures developed to assess the psychosocial health of AYA cancer survivors. Searches were limited to the years 1998-2008. A search of Medline revealed that the number of publications related to the assessment of psychosocial well-being in AYA cancer survivors prior to this period were minimal. The psychometric properties of identified measures were evaluated against pre-determined and generally accepted psychometric criteria including: reliability (internal consistency and test-retest); validity (face, content, construct, and criterion); responsiveness; acceptability; and feasibility.

Results: Seven quality of life measures met the inclusion criteria. No measures of unmet need were identified. All seven measures reported adequate internal consistency, face, content, and construct validity. Test-retest reliability, criterion (predictive) validity, responsiveness, acceptability, and feasibility were rarely examined.

Conclusions: There is a need to further evaluate the psychometric properties of existing quality of life measures for AYA cancer survivors. Valid, reliable, and acceptable measures which can assess the psychosocial needs of this population should also be developed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of publications related to the assessment of psychosocial well-being in AYA cancer survivors by year (1988-2008).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flowchart of the publication and measure inclusion and exclusion process. *Some publications described the development ofmore than one measure. ** Development of some measures were reported across more than one publication.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Mathers C, Lopez A, Murray C. In: Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. Lopez A, Mathers C, Ezzati M, Jamison D, Murray C, editor. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006. The Burden of Disease and Mortality by Condition: Data, Methods and Results for 2001; pp. 45–93. 174. - PubMed
    1. Soliman H, Agresta SV. Current issues in adolescent and young adult cancer survivorship. Cancer Control. 2008;15(1):55–62. - PubMed
    1. Pollock BH, Birch JM. Registration and classification of adolescent and young adult cancer cases. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008;50(5 Suppl):1090–1093. - PubMed
    1. Thomas DM, Seymour JF, O'Brien T, Sawyer SM, Ashley DM. Adolescent and young adult cancer: a revolution in evolution? Internal Medicine Journal. 2006;36(5):302–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01062.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Desandes E. Survival from adolescent cancer. Cancer Treatment Reviews. 2007;33(7):609–615. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.12.007. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types