Unethical female stereotyping in reproductive health
- PMID: 20206355
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.002
Unethical female stereotyping in reproductive health
Abstract
Stereotypes are generalized preconceptions defining individuals by group categories into which they are placed. Women have become stereotyped as homemakers and mothers, with the negative effect of precluding them from other roles and functions. Legislation and judicial constructions show a history, and often a continuing practice, of confining women to these stereotypical functions. In access to reproductive and sexual health care, for instance, women's requests have been professionally subject to approval of their husbands, fathers or comparable males. Choice of abortion is particularly significant, because it embeds moral values. Women's capacity to act as responsible moral agents is denied by stereotypical attitudes shown by legislators, judges, heads of religious denominations, and healthcare providers who consider women incapable of exercising responsible moral choice. These attitudes violate ethical requirements of treating patients with respect and equal justice. They can also result in violations of human rights laws that prohibit discrimination against women.
Copyright 2010 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Legal and ethical standards for protecting women's human rights and the practice of conscientious objection in reproductive healthcare settings.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Dec;123 Suppl 3:S63-5. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7292(13)60005-3. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013. PMID: 24332237 Review.
-
The need for balancing the reproductive rights of women and the unborn in the Mexican courtroom.Med Law Rev. 2010 Autumn;18(3):427-33. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwq018. Med Law Rev. 2010. PMID: 20739439 No abstract available.
-
Conscientious commitment to women's health.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 May;113(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Mar 21. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011. PMID: 21421213
-
Female genital mutilation or cutting: an updated medico-legal analysis.Med J Aust. 2020 Oct;213(7):309-311.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50768. Epub 2020 Sep 14. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 32924148 No abstract available.
-
International human rights and women's reproductive health.Stud Fam Plann. 1993 Mar-Apr;24(2):73-86. Stud Fam Plann. 1993. PMID: 8511808 Review.
Cited by
-
"It's a touchy subject": Latino adolescent sexual risk behaviors in the school context.Appl Nurs Res. 2012 Nov;25(4):231-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Jul 8. Appl Nurs Res. 2012. PMID: 21741798 Free PMC article.
-
Criminalisation under scrutiny: how constitutional courts are changing their narrative by using public health evidence in abortion cases.Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019 Dec;27(1):1620552. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2019.1620552. Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2019. PMID: 31533574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sexual Abuse vs. Sexual Freedom? A Legal Approach to the Age of Sexual Consent in Adolescents in Spanish-Speaking Countries.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 5;18(19):10460. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910460. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639760 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources