Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial
- PMID: 20206581
- DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70054-5
Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation for acute treatment of migraine with aura: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, sham-controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Preliminary work suggests that single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) could be effective as a treatment for migraine. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a new portable sTMS device for acute treatment of migraine with aura.
Methods: We undertook a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, two-phase, sham-controlled study at 18 centres in the USA. 267 adults aged 18-68 years were enrolled into phase one. All individuals had to meet international criteria for migraine with aura, with visual aura preceding at least 30% of migraines followed by moderate or severe headache in more than 90% of those attacks. 66 patients dropped out during phase one. In phase two, 201 individuals were randomly allocated by computer to either sham stimulation (n=99) or sTMS (n=102). We instructed participants to treat up to three attacks over 3 months while experiencing aura. The primary outcome was pain-free response 2 h after the first attack, and co-primary outcomes were non-inferiority at 2 h for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. Analyses were modified intention to treat and per protocol. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00449540.
Findings: 37 patients did not treat a migraine attack and were excluded from outcome analyses. 164 patients treated at least one attack with sTMS (n=82) or sham stimulation (n=82; modified intention-to-treat analysis set). Pain-free response rates after 2 h were significantly higher with sTMS (32/82 [39%]) than with sham stimulation (18/82 [22%]), for a therapeutic gain of 17% (95% CI 3-31%; p=0.0179). Sustained pain-free response rates significantly favoured sTMS at 24 h and 48 h post-treatment. Non-inferiority was shown for nausea, photophobia, and phonophobia. No device-related serious adverse events were recorded, and incidence and severity of adverse events were similar between sTMS and sham groups.
Interpretation: Early treatment of migraine with aura by sTMS resulted in increased freedom from pain at 2 h compared with sham stimulation, and absence of pain was sustained 24 h and 48 h after treatment. sTMS could be a promising acute treatment for some patients with migraine with aura.
Funding: Neuralieve.
2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new way to treat migraine attacks with aura.Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):335-7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70063-6. Epub 2010 Mar 4. Lancet Neurol. 2010. PMID: 20206580 No abstract available.
-
Migraine: Portable sTMS device relieves the pain of migraine.Nat Rev Neurol. 2010 May;6(5):239. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.42. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010. PMID: 20455284 No abstract available.
-
Re: Placebo responses in device studies.Cephalalgia. 2018 Apr;38(5):1007-1008. doi: 10.1177/0333102417722498. Epub 2017 Jul 26. Cephalalgia. 2018. PMID: 28747062 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (sTMS) for the acute treatment of migraine: evaluation of outcome data for the UK post market pilot program.J Headache Pain. 2015;16:535. doi: 10.1186/s10194-015-0535-3. Epub 2015 Jun 3. J Headache Pain. 2015. PMID: 26055242 Free PMC article.
-
A multicenter, prospective, single arm, open label, observational study of sTMS for migraine prevention (ESPOUSE Study).Cephalalgia. 2018 May;38(6):1038-1048. doi: 10.1177/0333102418762525. Epub 2018 Mar 4. Cephalalgia. 2018. PMID: 29504483 Free PMC article.
-
Variability of clinical features in attacks of migraine with aura.Cephalalgia. 2016 Mar;36(3):216-24. doi: 10.1177/0333102415584601. Epub 2015 May 5. Cephalalgia. 2016. PMID: 25944814 Clinical Trial.
-
The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation on migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails.J Headache Pain. 2017 Aug 22;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0792-4. J Headache Pain. 2017. PMID: 28831756 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcranial magnetic simulation in the treatment of migraine.Neurotherapeutics. 2010 Apr;7(2):204-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.03.002. Neurotherapeutics. 2010. PMID: 20430320 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the brain: guidelines for pain treatment research.Pain. 2015 Sep;156(9):1601-1614. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000210. Pain. 2015. PMID: 25919472 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Emerging treatments for the primary headache disorders.Neurol Sci. 2015 May;36 Suppl 1:109-13. doi: 10.1007/s10072-015-2133-1. Neurol Sci. 2015. PMID: 26017524 Review.
-
Consistent effects of non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) for the acute treatment of migraine: additional findings from the randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind PRESTO trial.J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 1;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0929-0. J Headache Pain. 2018. PMID: 30382909 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Potential Application of Optogenetic Stimulation in the Treatment of Pain and Migraine Headache: A Perspective from Animal Studies.Brain Sci. 2019 Jan 29;9(2):26. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9020026. Brain Sci. 2019. PMID: 30699891 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Traditional and Novel Migraine Therapy in the Aging Population.Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 May 11;23(6):42. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0789-6. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019. PMID: 31079259 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous