Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study
- PMID: 20207063
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.02.012
Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study
Abstract
Objective: Robotic surgery, with its technical advances, promises to open a new window to minimally invasive surgery in gynaecology. Feasibility and safety of this surgical innovation have been demonstrated in several studies, and now a critical analysis of these new developments regarding outcome and costs is in place. So far only a few studies compare robotic with conventional laparoscopic surgery in gynaecology. Our objective was to evaluate our initial experience performing total robot-assisted hysterectomy with the da Vinci surgical system and compare peri-operative outcome and costs with total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Study design: For this prospective matched case-control study at our institution, peri-operative data from our first 40 consecutive total robot-assisted hysterectomies for benign indications were recorded and matched 1:1 with total laparoscopic hysterectomies according to age, BMI and uterus weight. Surgical costs were calculated for both procedures. Surgeons' subjective impressions of robotics were evaluated with a self-developed questionnaire.
Results: No conversions to laparotomy or severe peri-operative complications occurred. Mean operating time was 109 (113; 50-170) min for the robotic group and 83 (80; 55-165) min for the conventional laparoscopic group. Mean postoperative hospitalisation for robotic surgery was 3.3 (3; 2-6) days versus 3.9 (4; 2-7) days for the conventional laparoscopic group. Average surgical cost of a robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy was 4067 euros compared to 2151 euros for the conventional laparoscopic procedure at our institution. For the robotic group wider range of motion of the instruments and better ergonomics were considered to be an advantage, and lack of direct access to the patient was stated as a disadvantage.
Conclusion: Robot-assited hysterectomy is a feasible and interesting new technique with comparable outcome to total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Operating times of total laparoscopic hysterectomy seem to be achieved quickly especially for experienced laparoscopic surgeons. However, costs of robotic surgery are still higher than for conventional laparoscopy. Randomised clinical trials need to be conducted to further evaluate benefits of this new technology for patients and surgeons and analyse its cost-effectiveness in gynaecology.
Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study.Ann Surg. 2008 Jun;247(6):987-93. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318172501f. Ann Surg. 2008. PMID: 18520226 Clinical Trial.
-
Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Oct;19(5):311-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1233495. Epub 2009 Oct 14. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009. PMID: 19830631
-
A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008 May-Jun;15(3):286-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2008.01.008. Epub 2008 Mar 6. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008. PMID: 18439499
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic hysterectomy: a review of recent comparative studies.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Aug;23(4):283-8. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e328348a26e. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2011. PMID: 21666467 Review.
-
Pediatric robotic surgery: early assessment.Pediatrics. 2009 Dec;124(6):1642-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3822. Epub 2009 Nov 16. Pediatrics. 2009. PMID: 19917586 Review.
Cited by
-
Robotic Surgery in Gynecology.Front Surg. 2016 May 2;3:26. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00026. eCollection 2016. Front Surg. 2016. PMID: 27200358 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Direct cost of hysterectomy: comparison of robotic versus other routes.J Robot Surg. 2020 Apr;14(2):305-310. doi: 10.1007/s11701-019-00982-7. Epub 2019 Jun 5. J Robot Surg. 2020. PMID: 31165995
-
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8:CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub6. PMID: 26264829 Free PMC article. Updated.
-
Cost analysis of minimally invasive hysterectomy vs open approach performed by a single surgeon in an Italian center.J Robot Surg. 2017 Jun;11(2):115-121. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0625-5. Epub 2016 Jul 26. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 27460843
-
Robotic surgery in gynecology.J Minim Access Surg. 2015 Jan-Mar;11(1):50-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.147690. J Minim Access Surg. 2015. PMID: 25598600 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical