An evaluation of peak expiratory flow monitoring: a comparison of sitting versus standing measurements
- PMID: 20207926
- DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090120
An evaluation of peak expiratory flow monitoring: a comparison of sitting versus standing measurements
Abstract
Introduction: Current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma suggest that patients perform peak expiratory flow (PEF) measurements while standing; however, recent literature suggests this may not be necessary. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of patient position on PEF measurements.
Methods: A randomized observational analysis of PEF measurements for 211 patients in sitting and standing positions was performed. The highest PEF measurement from tests performed with correct technique in both the sitting and standing position was compared.
Results: Overall, PEF measurements did not significantly differ between the sitting and standing positions (506 +/- 2 L/min versus 508 +/- 2 L/min; P = .45). No differences were seen between mean PEF measurements in the sitting or standing positions for either women or men, nor were there significant differences between mean PEF values for the sitting and standing positions in participants who reported a history of asthma.
Conclusions: PEF measurements do not significantly differ based on sitting or standing measurements among healthy participants. Based on the results of this study it may not be necessary for the patient to stand while performing PEF measurements. Further study among patients with asthma is warranted.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of factors affecting peak expiratory flow in healthy adults: is it necessary to stand up?J Asthma. 2005 Nov;42(9):793-4. doi: 10.1080/02770900500308528. J Asthma. 2005. PMID: 16316876
-
Peak expiratory flow in bed? A comparison of 3 positions.Respir Care. 2013 Mar;58(3):494-7. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01843. Respir Care. 2013. PMID: 22906434 Clinical Trial.
-
[A study on peak expiratory flow monitoring maneuver as compared to forced expiratory flow maneuver].Arerugi. 1996 Jan;45(1):34-40. Arerugi. 1996. PMID: 8851314 Japanese.
-
[Peak flow monitoring of asthmatic patients. 1. Basis for measurement procedures and normal values].Ugeskr Laeger. 1990 Mar 12;152(11):723-6. Ugeskr Laeger. 1990. PMID: 2181753 Review. Danish.
-
[Effectiveness of PEF monitoring in chronic management of asthma patients].Nihon Rinsho. 1996 Nov;54(11):2919-26. Nihon Rinsho. 1996. PMID: 8950931 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
The effect of body position on pulmonary function: a systematic review.BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):159. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0723-4. BMC Pulm Med. 2018. PMID: 30305051 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of Using Strength Measures, Including Peak Inspiratory Flow, for Routine Monitoring in Case Management Patients Aged 65 and Over.Geriatrics (Basel). 2020 Sep 21;5(3):59. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics5030059. Geriatrics (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32967375 Free PMC article.
-
The Effect of Change in Posture on Spirometry in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea Syndrome.Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019 Nov;19(4):e310-e315. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2019.19.04.006. Epub 2019 Dec 22. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019. PMID: 31897314 Free PMC article.
-
Does peak expiratory flow measured sitting differ from that measured standing? A cross-over study in primary care in Barbados.BJGP Open. 2018 Jun 27;2(2):bjgpopen18X101592. doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen18X101592. eCollection 2018 Jul. BJGP Open. 2018. PMID: 30564725 Free PMC article.
-
Joint Indian Chest Society-National College of Chest Physicians (India) guidelines for spirometry.Lung India. 2019 Apr;36(Supplement):S1-S35. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_300_18. Lung India. 2019. PMID: 31006703 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical