Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Winter;2(4):291-9.
doi: 10.1353/cpr.0.0040.

Cancer assessment methodology in a native Hawaiian community

Affiliations

Cancer assessment methodology in a native Hawaiian community

Andrea Siu et al. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2008 Winter.

Abstract

Background: Limited data have been collected on cancer in Native Hawaiian communities, although Native Hawaiians tend to have higher cancer mortality rates than other ethnic groups in Hawaii.

Objectives: We sought to describe the community-based participatory research (CBPR) process used to deliver a culturally tailored protocol, combining traditional Native Hawaiian practices and random sampling methods, to determine cancer screening practices and program preferences of residents of a Hawaiian Homes (HH) community.

Methods: Following a culturally tailored protocol, we attempted to survey half of the 644 households in the Waimanalo Hawaiian Homes Community (WHHC). Pairs of Native Hawaiian college students performed the majority of data collection; a community member joined them if available. Visits to the selected homes were tracked and participation rates estimated. Additional information on this methodology emerged from discussions between researchers and community members.

Results: Of the 449 households accessed, 187 (42%) completed the survey, with an average of two visits per household. Individuals at 63 (14%) households refused outright. The remaining 199 (44%) homes were visited up to five times, but produced no response. Although some homes were vacant, often it appeared that residents were home but unresponsive. Our sampling procedure (targeting every other house and requiring accrual of 75 individuals in each of four age-gender groups) reduced participation.

Conclusions: The use of CBPR built capacity for all partners by engaging them in all levels of research. The results, however, suggest the need for a more inclusive sampling strategy and the continued use of CBPR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Albano JD, Ward E, Jemal A, Anderson R, Cokkinides VE, Murray T, et al. Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1384–94. - PubMed
    1. Moy E, Smith CR, Johansson P, Andrews R. Gaps in data for American Indians and Alaska Natives in the National Healthcare Disparities Report. Am Indian Alsk Native Ment Health Res. 2006;13:52–69. - PubMed
    1. Rice DP, Drury TF, Mugge RH. Household health interviews and minority health: the NCHS perspective. Med Care. 1980;18:327–35. - PubMed
    1. Bierman AS, Lurie N, Collins KS, Eisenberg JM. Addressing racial and ethnic barriers to effective health care: the need for better data. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:91–102. - PubMed
    1. Fiscella K, Franks P, Gold MR, Clancy CM. Inequality in quality: addressing socioeconomic, racial, and ethnic disparities in health care. JAMA. 2000;283:2579–84. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources