Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Nov-Dec;75(6):794-800.
doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30539-5.

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values

Affiliations

Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of hearing loss to different audiometric mean values

Karin Christine de Freitas Kasper Calviti et al. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Hearing loss in the elderly is one of the most incapacitating communication disorders, preventing them to fully perform their tasks in society.

Aim: This study aimed to determine what is the best tool that together with the audiometric tests better represents the hearing loss reported by the elderly and which frequencies in the audiometric test must be considered to determine the hearing loss degree.

Study: Clinical prospective.

Materials and methods: 71 elderly with ages between 60 and 82 years old were assessed. The subjects were submitted to a conventional audiometric assessment and a Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE) questionnaire. Three audiometric averages were analyzed and compared with the results obtained in the complete form (HHIE) and in its reduced form (HHIE-S).

Results: specificity showed values between 43.5% and 58.5% for HHIE with the different audiometric averages and values between 50% and 63.4% for the HHIE-S.

Conclusion: audiometric average pure tone thresholds in the frequencies of 4kHz and 6kHz found in the audiometric assessment did not contribute to the self-reported hearing handicap perception. The correlation between HHIE-S and PTA1 had the best specificity (63.4%) and best positive predictive value (62.5%).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paschoal SMP. In: Avaliação Global do Idoso: Manual da Liga da GAMIA. Jacob Filho W, Amaral JRG, editors. Atheneu; São Paulo: 2005. Qualidade de vida; pp. 59–60.
    1. Ventry IM, Weinstein BE. The Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly: a New Tool. Ear Hear. 1982;3(3):128–134. - PubMed
    1. Ventry I, Weinstein B. Identification of elderly people with hearing problems. Asha. 1983;25(7):37–42. - PubMed
    1. Lichtenstein MJ, Bess FH, Logan SA. Diagnostic performance of the hearing handicap inventory for the elderly (screening version) against differing definitions of hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1988;9(4):208–211. - PubMed
    1. Weinstein BE. The Quantification of Hearing Aid Benefit in the Elderly. The Role of Self-assessment Measure. ACTA Otolaryngol. 1991;(suppl 476):257–261. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources