Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2010 Mar 23;182(5):447-55.
doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090533. Epub 2010 Mar 8.

A cluster randomized controlled Trial to Evaluate an Ambulatory primary care Management program for patients with dyslipidemia: the TEAM study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A cluster randomized controlled Trial to Evaluate an Ambulatory primary care Management program for patients with dyslipidemia: the TEAM study

Julie Villeneuve et al. CMAJ. .

Abstract

Background: Few studies have reported the efficacy of collaborative care involving family physicians and community pharmacists for patients with dyslipidemia.

Methods: We randomly assigned clusters consisting of at least two physicians and at least four pharmacists to provide collaborative care or usual care. Under the collaborative care model, pharmacists counselled patients about their medications, requested laboratory tests, monitored the effectiveness and safety of medications and patients' adherence to therapy, and adjusted medication dosages. After 12 months of follow-up, we assessed changes in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (the primary outcome), the proportion of patients reaching their target lipid levels and changes in other risk factors.

Results: Fifteen clusters representing a total of 77 physicians and 108 pharmacists were initially recruited, and a total of 51 physicians and 49 pharmacists were included in the final analyses. The collaborative care teams followed a total of 108 patients, and the usual care teams followed a total of 117 patients. At baseline, mean LDL cholesterol level was higher in the collaborative care group (3.5 v. 3.2 mmol/L, p = 0.05). During the study, patients in the collaborative care group were less likely to receive high-potency statins (11% v. 40%), had more visits with health care professionals and more laboratory tests, were more likely to have their lipid-lowering treatment changed and were more likely to report lifestyle changes. At 12 months, the crude incremental mean reduction in LDL cholesterol in the collaborative care group was -0.2 mmol/L (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.3 to -0.1), and the adjusted reduction was -0.05 (95% CI -0.3 to 0.2). The crude relative risk of achieving lipid targets for patients in the collaborative care group was 1.10 (95% CI 0.95 to 1.26), and the adjusted relative risk was 1.16 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.34).

Interpretation: Collaborative care involving physicians and pharmacists had no significant clinical impact on lipid control in patients with dyslipidemia. International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial register no. ISRCTN66345533.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart for cluster randomized controlled trial comparing collaborative care by physicians and pharmacists with usual care for patients with dyslipidemia. R = randomization. *Physicians excluded because fewer than five physicians in their respective clusters agreed to participate (n = 56). †Pharmacists excluded because fewer than two pharmacists in their respective pharmacies agreed to participate (n = 16) or because they could not attend the workshop (n = 10). ‡First exclusion criteria: low risk of coronary artery disease (n = 1160), not a candidate to initiate or modify statin monotherapy (n = 310), triglycerides > 5.0 mmol/L or low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol > 5.0 mmol/L (n = 4), life-threatening disease (n = 13), taking more than one lipid-lowering drug (n = 3), contraindication to statin therapy (n = 1), acute cardiovascular event in past six months (n = 5), participation in another trial within past two months (n = 1). §First exclusion criteria: low risk of coronary artery disease (n = 992), not a candidate to initiate or modify statin monotherapy (n = 371), triglycerides > 5.0 mmol/L or low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol > 5.0 mmol/L (n = 14), life-threatening disease (n = 16), taking more than one lipid-lowering drug (n = 10), contraindication to statin therapy (n = 3), acute cardiovascular event in past six months (n = 4), participation in another trial within past two months n = 4). **Care providers excluded because they were not involved in follow-up for any study patients.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gould AL, Davies GM, Alemao E, et al. Cholesterol reduction yields clinical benefits: meta-analysis including recent trials. Clin Ther. 2007;29:778–94. - PubMed
    1. Avorn J, Monette J, Lacour A, et al. Persistence of use of lipid-lowering medications. A cross-national study. JAMA. 1998;279:1458–62. - PubMed
    1. Perreault S, Blais L, Lamarre D, et al. Persistence and determinants of statin therapy among middle-aged patients for primary and secondary prevention. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59:564–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bourgault C, Davignon J, Fodor G, et al. Statin therapy in Canadian patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Canadian Lipid Study — Observational (CALIPSO) Can J Cardiol. 2005;21:1187–93. - PubMed
    1. Farahani P, Levine M. Goal attainment for multiple cardiovascular risk factors in community-based clinical practice (a Canadian experience) J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:212–6. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Associated data