Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2010 Apr;11(4):259-72.
doi: 10.1038/nrg2764.

Gene--environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches

Affiliations
Review

Gene--environment-wide association studies: emerging approaches

Duncan Thomas. Nat Rev Genet. 2010 Apr.

Abstract

Despite the yield of recent genome-wide association (GWA) studies, the identified variants explain only a small proportion of the heritability of most complex diseases. This unexplained heritability could be partly due to gene--environment (G×E) interactions or more complex pathways involving multiple genes and exposures. This Review provides a tutorial on the available epidemiological designs and statistical analysis approaches for studying specific G×E interactions and choosing the most appropriate methods. I discuss the approaches that are being developed for studying entire pathways and available techniques for mining interactions in GWA data. I also explore methods for marrying hypothesis-driven pathway-based approaches with 'agnostic' GWA studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the two-step GEWIS test for G×E interaction of Murcray et al. G1,…GM denotes the genotypes at each SNP in a GWAS and E denotes a binary exposure variable. G-E association is first tested in the combined case and control sample and only the most significant SNPs are then tested for G×E interaction using the standard case-control (in this example, the second and fourth rows are taken forward to the second step). Despite the dilution of the induced G-E association in the first step by the inclusion of the controls, this approach yields a second-step test that is independent of the first and hence need only be corrected for the number of SNPs actually taken forward to the second. They showed that the resulting procedure has dramatically better power than a conventional single-step case-control comparison. The optimal design depends only weakly on the true model parameters. For rare diseases with a 1:1 ratio, any first-stage significance level of α1 ~ 0.0001 yields roughly similar power, although a common disease would require a much larger α1. In an application to the CHS GWA study for asthma, the first-stage test of association between SNPs and in utero tobacco smoke exposure in the combined case-control sample identified 15,006 SNPs that attained the optimized first-step threshold of α1 = 0.025; of these, the second stage case-control test yielded one nearly significant interaction (the second example in the figure), which would not have been deemed genomewide significant in a traditional 1-step test, nor by its main effect. This SNP shows no effect in the absence of in utero tobacco exposure and exposure shows no effect in non-carriers of the minor allele. The first row illustrates the most significant SNP × E interaction in a conventional single-stage test that fails the first-step procedure and hence is declared non-significant in the two-step procedure. The fourth row illustrates the most significant SNP–E association in the first step, which shows no sign of SNP×E interaction in the second step. (The marginal totals differ slightly from row to row because of missing genotypes.)

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Le Marchand L. The predominance of the environment over genes in cancer causation: implications for genetic epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005;14:1037–9. - PubMed
    1. Le Marchand L, Wilkens LR. Design considerations for genomic association studies: importance of gene-environment interactions. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008;17:263–7. - PubMed
    1. Kraft P, Yen YC, Stram DO, Morrison J, Gauderman WJ. Exploiting gene-environment interaction to detect genetic associations. Hum Hered. 2007;63:111–119. - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ. Gene-environment interactions in human diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:287–298. An excellent review of the basic principles of epidemiological study designs for G×E interactions in the pre-GWAS era. Amongst other insights, the author argues that G×E findings can “point the finger” towards the causal constituent of a complex mixture. - PubMed
    1. Greene CS, Penrod NM, Williams SM, Moore JH. Failure to replicate a genetic association may provide important clues about genetic architecture. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5639. - PMC - PubMed