Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2010 Winter;24(1):79-88.

The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. VI: future directions

Affiliations

The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders. VI: future directions

Gary C Anderson et al. J Orofac Pain. 2010 Winter.

Abstract

The Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD) Validation Project has provided the first comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity of the original Axis I and II. In addition, Axis I of the RDC/TMD was revised with estimates of reliability and validity. These findings are reported in the five preceding articles in this series. The aim of this article is to present further revisions of Axis I and II for consideration by the TMD research and clinical communities. Potential Axis I revisions include addressing concerns with orofacial pain differential diagnosis and changes in nomenclature in an attempt to provide improved consistency with other musculoskeletal diagnostic systems. In addition, expansion of the RDC/TMD to include the less common TMD conditions and disorders would make it more comprehensive and clinically useful. The original standards for diagnostic sensitivity ( < or = 0.70) and specificity (< or = 0.95) should be reconsidered to reflect changes in the field since the RDC/TMD was published in 1992. Pertaining to Axis II, current recommendations for all chronic pain conditions include standardized instruments and expansion of the domains assessed. In addition, there is need for improved clinical efficiency of Axis II instruments and for exploring methods to better integrate Axis I and II in clinical settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Laskin D, Greenfield W, Gale E, Rugh J, Neff P, Alling C, et al., editors. The President’s Conference on the Examination, Diagnosis and Management of Temporomandibular Disorders. Chicago: American Dental Association; 1983.
    1. Sessle BJ, Bryant PS, Dionne RA, editors. Temporomandibular Disorders and Related Pain Conditions. Seattle: IASP Press; 1995.
    1. Fricton JR, Dubner R, editors. Advances in Pain Research and Therapy: Orofacial Pain and Temporomandibular Disorders. New York: Raven Press; 1995.
    1. Management of temporomandibular disorders. National Institutes of Health Technology Assessment Conference Statement. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1595–1606. - PubMed
    1. Dworkin SF, LeResche L, editors. J Craniomandib Disord Facial Oral Pain. 4. Vol. 6. 1992. Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique; pp. 301–355. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources