Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation
- PMID: 20213073
- PMCID: PMC2929359
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-010-1784-x
Effect of the AutoPulse automated band chest compression device on hemodynamics in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation
Abstract
Purpose: Guidelines for advanced life support of cardiac arrest (CA) emphasize continuous and effective chest compressions as one of the main factors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) success. The use of an automated load distributing chest compression device for CPR is promising but initial studies on survival show contradictory results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of AutoPulse on blood pressure (BP) in out-of-hospital CA patients.
Methods: This prospective study included adult patients presenting with in refractory out-of-hospital CA. Invasive arterial BP produced by AutoPulse was compared to BP generated by manual CPR (Active Compression Decompression). Systolic, diastolic and mean BP and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded before and after initiating the automated band device for each patient. The comparison of diastolic BP produced by manual CPR versus automated chest compressions was the primary end point.
Results: Hemodynamics in 29 patients are reported and analyzed. Median diastolic BP increased after starting AutoPulse from 17[11-25] mmHg to 23[18-28] mmHg (P < 0.001). Median systolic BP increased from 72[55-105] mmHg to 106[78-135] mmHg (P = 0.02). Mean BP increased from 29[25-38] mmHg to 36[30-15] mmHg (P = 0.002). On the other hand, End-Tidal CO(2) did not increase significantly with AutoPulse (21[13-36] vs. 22[12-35] mmHg, P = 0.80).
Conclusions: In patients with out-of-hospital CA, the use of AutoPulse is associated with an increased diastolic BP compared to manual chest compressions. While its benefit to survival has yet to be demonstrated, the increase in diastolic and mean BP is a promising outcome for AutoPulse use.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the AutoPulse system: a prospective observational study with a new load-distributing band chest compression device.Resuscitation. 2007 Apr;73(1):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.08.027. Epub 2007 Jan 24. Resuscitation. 2007. PMID: 17254691
-
The impact of a new CPR assist device on rate of return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):61-7. doi: 10.1080/10903120590891714. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005. PMID: 16036830
-
Improved hemodynamic performance with a novel chest compression device during treatment of in-hospital cardiac arrest.Resuscitation. 2004 Jun;61(3):273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.01.025. Resuscitation. 2004. PMID: 15172705
-
[New mechanical methods for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Literature study and analysis of effectiveness].Anaesthesist. 1997 Mar;46(3):220-30. doi: 10.1007/s001010050395. Anaesthesist. 1997. PMID: 9163267 Review. German.
-
[The use of mechanical chest compression devices for both out-of-hospital and in-hospital refractory cardiac arrest].G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2017 Apr;18(4):305-312. doi: 10.1714/2683.27473. G Ital Cardiol (Rome). 2017. PMID: 28492570 Review. Italian.
Cited by
-
Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2010: II. Pneumonia and infections, cardiovascular and haemodynamics, organization, education, haematology, nutrition, ethics and miscellanea.Intensive Care Med. 2011 Feb;37(2):196-213. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2123-y. Epub 2011 Jan 12. Intensive Care Med. 2011. PMID: 21225240 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of hemodynamic effects and resuscitation outcomes between automatic simultaneous sterno-thoracic cardiopulmonary resuscitation device and LUCAS in a swine model of cardiac arrest.PLoS One. 2019 Aug 30;14(8):e0221965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221965. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31469891 Free PMC article.
-
Successful Prolonged Mechanical CPR in a Severely Poisoned Hypothermic Patient: A Case Report.Case Rep Emerg Med. 2012;2012:381798. doi: 10.1155/2012/381798. Epub 2012 Aug 23. Case Rep Emerg Med. 2012. PMID: 23326711 Free PMC article.
-
[Mechanical resuscitation assist devices].Anaesthesist. 2014 Mar;63(3):186-97. doi: 10.1007/s00101-013-2265-8. Anaesthesist. 2014. PMID: 24569931 Review. German.
-
Clinical evaluation of the AutoPulse automated chest compression device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the northern district of Shanghai, China.Arch Med Sci. 2016 Jun 1;12(3):563-70. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.59930. Epub 2016 May 18. Arch Med Sci. 2016. PMID: 27279849 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nolan JP, Deakin CD, Soar J, Böttiger BW, Smith G. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2005, Section 4. Adult advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67S1:S39–S86. - PubMed
-
- International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation. 2005 International Guidelines Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Care Science with Treatment Recommandations. Part 4: Advanced Life support. Resuscitation. 2005;67:213–247. - PubMed
-
- Delguercio LR, Feins NR, Cohn JD, Coomaraswamy RP, Wollman SB, State D. Comparison of blood flow during external and internal cardiac massage in man. Circulation. 1965;31:171–180. - PubMed
-
- Wik L, Kramer-Johansen J, Myklebust H, et al. Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. JAMA. 2005;293:299–304. - PubMed