Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions
- PMID: 20213591
- DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243990
Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions
Abstract
Background and aims: En bloc resection is preferred for colonic laterally spreading tumors, but is limited to 20 mm with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) using normal saline submucosal injection. Our aims were to compare the efficacy and safety of circumferential submucosal incision prior to EMR (CSI-EMR) versus conventional EMR for en bloc resection of artificial lesions 40 x 40 mm in size using submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin in a porcine colon model.
Subjects and methods: Two areas of normal rectosigmoid mucosa measuring 40 x 40 mm were marked with soft coagulation for en bloc resection in each of 10 pigs. By alternate allocation, one was removed with conventional snare-based EMR following submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin. The other was circumferentially incised using an insulated-tip knife, followed by submucosal succinylated gelatin injection followed by EMR of the isolated area. All procedures were performed by a single endoscopist with significant experience of EMR but none of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Euthanasia and colectomy were performed on day 10. Specimens and ex vivo colon resection sites were examined by a specialist gastrointestinal histopathologist blinded to the technique used.
Results: En bloc excision rates were 70 % for CSI-EMR vs. 0 % for conventional EMR ( P = 0.016). The median number of resections was 1 (interquartile range, IQR: 1-2) for CSI-EMR vs. 4 (3 - 6) for EMR ( P < 0.001). Mean specimen dimensions were 50 x 43 mm for CSI-EMR vs. 37 x 32 mm for EMR ( P = 0.001). Overall procedure duration (mean +/- SD) was 30.3 +/- 19.8 minutes for CSI-EMR vs. 12.4 +/- 6.8 minutes ( P = 0.003) for EMR. The mean duration of the final 5 CSI-EMRs was 17 minutes, with a statistically significant learning effect R = -0.7, P = 0.025. No perforations or bleeding occurred. All animals were euthanased on day 10. Histologically, CSI-EMR resulted in larger specimens and deeper submucosal resections.
Conclusions: CSI-EMR with submucosal injection of succinylated gelatin is safe and superior to conventional EMR, consistently resulting in en bloc resections larger than 50 x 40 mm. With experience, total procedure duration is comparable.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart.New York.
Similar articles
-
Beyond the snare: technically accessible large en bloc colonic resection in the West: an animal study.Dig Endosc. 2012 Jan;24(1):21-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2011.01154.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18. Dig Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22211408
-
Succinylated gelatin substantially increases en bloc resection size in colonic EMR: a randomized, blinded trial in a porcine model.Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):589-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.033. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010. PMID: 20189519
-
Randomized controlled study of EMR versus endoscopic submucosal dissection with a water-jet hybrid-knife of esophageal lesions in a porcine model.Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul;70(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.042. Epub 2009 Mar 14. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009. PMID: 19286176
-
Efficacy and adverse events of EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection for the treatment of colon neoplasms: a meta-analysis of studies comparing EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection.Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):583-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.034. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25592748 Review.
-
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 2011, a Western perspective.Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011 Apr;35(4):288-94. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Mar 31. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011. PMID: 21458402 Review.
Cited by
-
Simulator-based training method in gastrointestinal endoscopy training and currently available simulators.Clin Endosc. 2023 Jan;56(1):1-13. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.191. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Clin Endosc. 2023. PMID: 36604834 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Selective tissue elevation by pressure for endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal adenoma: first clinical trial.Surg Endosc. 2012 Feb;26(2):343-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1873-0. Epub 2011 Oct 13. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 21993928 Clinical Trial.
-
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided inoculation of transmissible venereal tumor in the colon: A large animal model for colon neoplasia.Endosc Ultrasound. 2016 Mar-Apr;5(2):85-93. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.180471. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016. PMID: 27080606 Free PMC article.
-
Circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection provides comparable clinical outcomes to submucosal dissection for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the rectum.Surg Endosc. 2015 Jun;29(6):1500-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3831-0. Epub 2014 Oct 3. Surg Endosc. 2015. PMID: 25277474
-
Improved Techniques for Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) in Colorectal Adenoma.Viszeralmedizin. 2014 Feb;30(1):33-8. doi: 10.1159/000358243. Viszeralmedizin. 2014. PMID: 26286120 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous