Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model
- PMID: 20213710
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.3793
Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model
Abstract
In medical research, risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures for survival times have been mainly proposed without consideration of covariates. In this paper, we develop adjusted RD and NNT measures for use in observational studies with survival time outcomes within the framework of the Cox proportional hazards regression model taking the distribution of confounders into account. We consider the typical situation of a cohort study in which the effect of an exposure on a survival time outcome is investigated and important covariates have to be taken into account. The exposure effect described by means of the RD and NNT measures in dependence on whether the effect of allocating an exposure to unexposed persons (number needed to be exposed) or that of removing an exposure from exposed persons (exposure impact number) is considered. Estimation of these adjusted RD and NNT measures is performed by using the average RD approach recently developed for logistic regression. To determine standard errors and confidence intervals for these estimators we use two approaches, the delta method with respect to the regression coefficients of the Cox model and bootstrapping and compare each other. The performance of these estimators is assessed by performing Monte Carlo simulations demonstrating clear advantages of the bootstrap method. The proposed method for point and interval estimation of adjusted RD and NNT measures in the Cox model is illustrated by means of data of the Düsseldorf Obesity Mortality Study (DOMS).
Similar articles
-
Estimating adjusted NNT measures in logistic regression analysis.Stat Med. 2007 Dec 30;26(30):5586-95. doi: 10.1002/sim.3061. Stat Med. 2007. PMID: 17879268
-
A note on calculating asymptotic confidence intervals for the adjusted risk difference and number needed to treat in the Cox regression model.Stat Med. 2014 Feb 28;33(5):798-810. doi: 10.1002/sim.5913. Epub 2013 Jul 30. Stat Med. 2014. PMID: 23900761
-
A weighted Cox model for modelling time-dependent exposures in the analysis of case-control studies.Stat Med. 2010 Mar 30;29(7-8):839-50. doi: 10.1002/sim.3764. Stat Med. 2010. PMID: 20213717
-
A brief introduction to computer-intensive methods, with a view towards applications in spatial statistics and stereology.J Microsc. 2011 Apr;242(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03452.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18. J Microsc. 2011. PMID: 21118243 Review.
-
[Number needed to treat: Interpretation and estimation in multivariable analyses and censored data].Med Clin (Barc). 2014 May 20;142(10):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.medcli.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 Jul 11. Med Clin (Barc). 2014. PMID: 23850150 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Number needed to treat (NNT) in clinical literature: an appraisal.BMC Med. 2017 Jun 1;15(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0875-8. BMC Med. 2017. PMID: 28571585 Free PMC article.
-
Using and Interpreting Adjusted NNT Measures in Biomedical Research.Open Dent J. 2010 Jul 16;4:72-6. doi: 10.2174/1874210601004020072. Open Dent J. 2010. PMID: 20871755 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of your results: Beyond the relative risk.Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018 Sep 30;2(4):653-657. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12148. eCollection 2018 Oct. Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2018. PMID: 30349882 Free PMC article.
-
Targeted maximum likelihood estimation of effect modification parameters in survival analysis.Int J Biostat. 2011 Mar 30;7(1):19. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1307. Int J Biostat. 2011. PMID: 21556287 Free PMC article.
-
The number needed to treat adjusted for explanatory variables in regression and survival analysis: Theory and application.Stat Med. 2022 Jul 30;41(17):3299-3320. doi: 10.1002/sim.9418. Epub 2022 Apr 26. Stat Med. 2022. PMID: 35472818 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous