Improving osseointegration of dental implants
- PMID: 20214429
- DOI: 10.1586/erd.09.74
Improving osseointegration of dental implants
Abstract
In the beginning of implantology, the procedures adopted for treating patients were performed in two surgical phases with an interval of 3-6 months. Nowadays, it is possible to insert and load a dental implant in the same surgical procedure. This change is due to several factors, such as improvement of surgical technique, modifications of the implant design, increased quality of implant manufacturing, development of the surgical instruments' quality, careful patient screening and adequate treatment of the implant surface. The clinical results show that adequate treatment of surfaces is crucial for reducing healing time and treating at-risk patients. The surface properties of dental implants can be significantly improved at the manufacturing stage, affecting cells' activity during the healing phase that will ultimately determine the host tissue response, a fundamental requirement for clinical success. This review focuses on different types of dental implant surfaces and the influence of surface characteristics on osseointegration.
Similar articles
-
Implant surfaces.Dent Clin North Am. 2006 Jul;50(3):323-38, v. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.03.001. Dent Clin North Am. 2006. PMID: 16818018 Review.
-
Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009 Dec;11(4):338-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00148.x. Epub 2009 Apr 23. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2009. PMID: 19438966 Clinical Trial.
-
Status of surface treatment in endosseous implant: a literary overview.Indian J Dent Res. 2010 Jul-Sep;21(3):433-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.70805. Indian J Dent Res. 2010. PMID: 20930358 Review.
-
Innovations in dental implant design for current therapy.Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011 May;23(2):193-200, v. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2011.02.001. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2011. PMID: 21492795 Review.
-
Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007 Mar 1;8(3):29-36. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007. PMID: 17351679
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Bone Response to a Nano HA Implant Surface on Sinus Lifting Procedures: Study in Rabbits.J Funct Biomater. 2022 Aug 21;13(3):122. doi: 10.3390/jfb13030122. J Funct Biomater. 2022. PMID: 35997460 Free PMC article.
-
Biomaterials for the programming of cell growth in oral tissues: The possible role of APA.Bioinformation. 2011 Jan 6;5(7):291-3. doi: 10.6026/97320630005291. Bioinformation. 2011. PMID: 21364837 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Er:YAG Pulsed Laser-Deposited Hydroxyapatite Film on Titanium Implants on M2 Macrophage Polarization In Vitro and Osteogenesis In Vivo.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 26;25(1):349. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010349. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 38203519 Free PMC article.
-
Biomedical Alloys and Physical Surface Modifications: A Mini-Review.Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 22;15(1):66. doi: 10.3390/ma15010066. Materials (Basel). 2021. PMID: 35009212 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The use of concentrated growth factor in dental implantology: A systematic review.J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_375_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020. PMID: 32089593 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources